Claim and evidence Close ×
The preprint of 27 November 2023 states that the design capabilities of biological design tools could be used to evade DNA screening techniques, against the premise that screening at synthesis is a dependable control point. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Subject version arXiv v1 (27 November 2023) · Published 2023-11-27 · Effective date not established Date 2023-11-27 · publication Role Context Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope of the passage Stated as a possibility ("could be used"), not as an observed outcome. Missing element The passage states that the design capabilities could be used to evade screening; it does not contest screening’s role as a control point on which mitigation depends, which the contesting relation would require. Scope and limits The record documents a possibility this paper states at the generality of its own abstract; it is not evidence that screening has been evaded, that any system is evadable, or that the proposition is false. No method of evasion is recorded. It holds no contesting or earliest-located role: the passage does not meet what the contesting relation requires. Downgraded at admission from the role the pack gave it, on the cross-family check of 2026-10-30: the passage does not meet the proposition’s criterion as worded. The record keeps the passage and says what it lacks. (item 105). Recorded at the generality of the paper's abstract. No technique, system or means of evasion is quoted or paraphrased, and the paper's body passages on this point were excluded.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Towards Responsible Governance of Biological Design Tools ↗ arXiv (preprint; workshop paper, Regulatable Machine Learning at NeurIPS 2023) · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “the design capabilities could be used to discover drugs or evade DNA screening techniques” Location in source Abstract, PDF p. 1
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-30
Source details and check notes Authors arXiv (preprint; workshop paper, Regulatable Machine Learning at NeurIPS 2023) Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 9e0f06fab595a615ceac3470dd7690069f1460aac6715d2bf9fefaad8bd6054c). arXiv v1 of 27 November 2023 (per the PDF's arXiv stamp) Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 9e0f06fab595a615ceac3470dd7690069f1460aac6715d2bf9fefaad8bd6054c, the same bytes). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution arXiv (preprint; workshop paper, Regulatable Machine Learning at NeurIPS 2023), “Towards Responsible Governance of Biological Design Tools”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (14 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The paper is the primary source for its own statement; the clause is quoted at abstract level only. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 105) re-read the record’s sources and found partial support; its corrections were applied at admission. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. Date of the arXiv v1 stamp on the PDF.
Record ID ab-arg-d5-moulange-context