Claim and evidence Close ×
Sandbrink's preprint (arXiv v1, 24 June 2023) states that enhanced screening of gene synthesis is among the measures key to reducing the risks it describes. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Subject version arXiv v1 (24 June 2023) · Published 2023-06-24 · Effective date not established · Revised 2023-12-23 Date 2023-06-24 · publication Role Earliest located Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope of the passage Stated for the risks the preprint attributes to design tools in particular. Scope and limits The record documents what version 1 of this preprint proposes; it is not evidence that screening is effective or that the proposition is true. This record holds the earliest located articulation from admission on 2026-10-30: the earlier passage the pack headlined does not meet the criterion (cross-family check, item 98), and this one states that reducing the risks depends on enhanced screening. The replaced headline stays on record as a correction.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design tools ↗ arXiv (preprint, Jonas B. Sandbrink, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford) · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Key to reducing these risks will be enhanced screening of gene synthesis” Location in source Abstract, PDF p. 1 (final sentence)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-30
Source details and check notes Authors arXiv (preprint, Jonas B. Sandbrink, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford) Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 1ab85d8647f2d23079d35eb8162b70b3f970094106808ef4291fb89615db0afa). arXiv v1 of 24 June 2023 (the article was revised to v8 on 23 December 2023; this record cites v1 only) Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 1ab85d8647f2d23079d35eb8162b70b3f970094106808ef4291fb89615db0afa, the same bytes). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution arXiv (preprint, Jonas B. Sandbrink, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford), “Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design tools”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (12 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. Quotation stops before the clauses naming other measures; the preprint is the primary source for its own proposal. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 101) re-read the record’s sources and found full support. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of the arXiv v1 submission; only v1 is cited.
Record ID ab-arg-d5-sandbrink-articulates