Claim · 2025-07-17 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The ChatGPT Agent System Card states that OpenAI conducted human red teaming on biological risk as one of two key risk areas, and sets out an overview table of its biological and chemical evaluations.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

ChatGPT Agent System Card → reports evaluation of →

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

ChatGPT Agent System Cardreports evaluation of ↓

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Subject version: As dated July 17, 2025 on its cover · Published 2025-07-17 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-07-17 · publication

Scope and limitsRecords that the card names biological risk as an evaluated area; it is not a finding about the model and does not describe how any evaluation was carried out. The card's table of evaluations and its safeguards section contain technical content; only the statement that red teaming on biological risk was conducted is cited.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

ChatGPT Agent System Card

OpenAI · 2025-07-17

Archived copy, captured 2025-07-17: ChatGPT Agent System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“We conducted human red teaming on two key risk areas for ChatGPT Agent: biological risk and prompt injections.”

Location in source PDF p. 15 (printed p. 14), §4 Red Teaming, first sentence

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: System card dated 17 July 2025 on its cover. The quoted sentence and its page match the PDF served on 2026-10-04 and the Internet Archive capture of 2025-07-17; the two copies differ only in chart labels.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-07-17: ChatGPT Agent System Card. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-07-17. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: OpenAI, ChatGPT Agent System Card (2025-07-17).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (18 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A document names a concept as an evaluation category. This is not a finding that the evaluated system exhibits the property.

Date. As stated in the card of 17 July 2025.

Record ID ab-ev-chatgpt-agent-bio-evaluation-categories