Claim · 2024-12-05 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The o1 System Card states that OpenAI's Preparedness evaluations cover four risk categories, one of which is CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear), and that o1 was evaluated in accordance with the Preparedness Framework.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

OpenAI o1 System Card (December 2024) → reports evaluation of →

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

OpenAI o1 System Card (December 2024)reports evaluation of ↓

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2024-12-05 · publication

Scope and limitsRecords the categories the card names and that it says the framework was applied; it is not evidence that the framework was followed as written, nor a finding about the model.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

OpenAI o1 System Card

OpenAI · 2024-12-05

Archived copy, captured 2026-09-06: OpenAI o1 System Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“The evaluations currently cover four risk categories: cybersecurity, CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear), persuasion, and model autonomy.”

Location in source PDF p. 15, §5 Preparedness Framework Evaluations, opening paragraph

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Page labelled Updated: December 5, 2024; includes multiple evaluation periods
Version date: 2024-12-05
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-09-17
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-09-06: OpenAI o1 System Card. Captured 640 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-09-06. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-17.
Attribution: OpenAI, OpenAI o1 System Card (2024-12-05).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and minimal attributed excerpts only. Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (17 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 24) re-read the record’s sources and found full support. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A document names a concept as an evaluation category. This is not a finding that the evaluated system exhibits the property.

Date. Dated by the card expression of 5 December 2024. The expression checked is the PDF served at cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card-20241205.pdf on 2026-10-28, which carries a footnote in §3 ('Scope of testing') reading 'Section added after December 5th on 12/19/2024'; the served file is therefore a later expression than the card's stated date of 5 December 2024, the card does not say what else differs, and the record keeps the stated date.

Record ID ab-ev-o1-card-cbrn-category