Claim and evidence Close ×
The June 2026 Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework states that CBRN risks are one of its named risk domains, that it applies refusal safeguards against malicious use and continues to assess how robust those safeguards are, and that public and internal benchmarks may be used to measure dual-use capability and resistance to facilitation. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Statement · provision ID faif-2026-cbrn-safeguard-assessment Subject version June 2026 edition · Publication date unknown · Effective 2026-06-30 Date 2026-06-30 · effective Scope and limits What the edition states, at policy level. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or safeguard effectiveness, and it names no model. The edition was read only by the cross-family machine check of 2026-10-30, in the archive capture the source names; this admission could not reach the Internet Archive, so the reading is not independently repeated here. The provision kind is `statement`, the dataset’s kind for a document’s stated content, because the schema’s other kinds require a verbatim quotation of the edition and none could be taken. The dataset already records this edition’s heightened-safeguard and risk-acceptance provisions from the publisher’s own copy; this record adds only what the check read on benchmark use and continued safeguard assessment. Policy-level provisions only; benchmark and evaluation detail was excluded by the check and is not recorded.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition ↗ xAI · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2026-07-16: Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase CBRN is one of the four named risk domains; the CBRN subsection states refusal safeguards against malicious use and continued assessment of how robust those safeguards are, and says public and internal benchmarks may measure dual-use capability and resistance to facilitation.
Location in source PDF pp. 2–4; §2.1(a)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-30
Source details and check notes Authors xAI Version Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework June 2026 edition; effective date 2026-06-30. Visible public cover identifies the effective edition; stale embedded PDF draft metadata is not used to infer publication status. Version date 2026-06-30 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-07-16: Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition ↗ . Captured 16 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-07-16. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution xAI, Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Added at the admission of the AI and biosecurity pack (research/ai-bio). The edition could not be read for the candidate pack or at admission: the publisher’s address failed and the Internet Archive refused this environment throughout. On 2026-10-30 the cross-family machine check opened the Internet Archive capture of 26 September 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260926012707/https://media.x.ai/v1/website/xai-frontier-artificial-intelligence-framework-30-june-2026-99c40684.pdf), whose cover gives the effective date 30 June 2026, and reported the edition’s policy-level provisions. This record rests on that reading, which this admission could not repeat. The passage is Selekoa’s policy-level paraphrase of what the check reported, not a quotation of the edition. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Provision as the edition states it, dated by the effective date printed on its cover, 30 June 2026. The capture read is of 26 September 2026.
Record ID ab-fw-faif-2026-cbrn-safeguard-assessment