Claim · 2025-02 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The Frontier Governance Framework of February 2025 states that, as evaluations mature, Microsoft intends to move its leading-indicator screening towards a more direct assessment of tracked capabilities such as CBRN weapon development, offensive cyberoperations and advanced autonomy.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Microsoft Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025) → states provision → Leading-indicator screening is intended to move towards direct assessment of tracked capabilities such as CBRN weapon development

Where it appears

Frontier safety frameworks →

Claim and evidence

Microsoft Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025)states provision ↓Leading-indicator screening is intended to move towards direct assessment of tracked capabilities such as CBRN weapon development

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Evaluation timing · provision ID msfgf-leading-indicator-direction
Subject version: Feb 2025 (Version 1) · Published 2025-02 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-02 · publication

Scope and limitsA stated intention, which the edition pairs with its statement that general-purpose benchmarks are its current leading indicator. It is not evidence that any direct assessment was built or run.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025)

Microsoft · 2025-02

Archived copy, captured 2025-02-26: Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“we intend to move this leading indicator screening toward a more direct assessment of tracked capabilities such as CBRN weapon development, offensive cyberoperations, and advanced autonomy”

Location in source PDF p. 6 (printed p. 5), §3 Capability assessment, paragraph on leading indicator assessments, second sentence

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Microsoft
Version: Frontier Governance Framework, Version 1 (February 2025); its change log reads “8 February 2025 – First version”. The file served at the recorded address (last modified 2025-02-12) is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2025-02-26, the earliest located.
Version date: 2025-02-08
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-03
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-02-26: Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025). Captured 18 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-02-26. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.
Attribution: Microsoft, Frontier Governance Framework, Version 1 (February 2025).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (26 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Provision as stated in this edition, dated by the edition’s publication month.

Record ID ab-fw-ms-fgf-2025-leading-indicator-direction