Claim · 2024-10-15 · effective · Stated in source · Supported

RSP v2.0 states that Anthropic maintains a current list of specific CBRN capabilities of concern for which it would implement stronger mitigations, treats these lists as sensitive, and plans to share them with organisations such as AI Safety Institutes and the Frontier Model Forum.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 → states provision → A list of specific CBRN capabilities of concern is maintained, treated as sensitive, and planned to be shared with AI Safety Institutes and the Frontier Model Forum

Where it appears

Frontier safety frameworks →

Claim and evidence

Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0states provision ↓A list of specific CBRN capabilities of concern is maintained, treated as sensitive, and planned to be shared with AI Safety Institutes and the Frontier Model Forum

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Reporting · provision ID rsp-cbrn-capabilities-list-sharing
Subject version: v2.0 · Publication date unknown · Effective 2024-10-15
Date: 2024-10-15 · effective

Scope and limitsA stated intention. The record does not establish that any list exists in a given form, that it was shared, or what it contains; the list itself is not recorded. The edition says the lists are sensitive and does not publish them; nothing from any such list is recorded here.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0

Anthropic · Publication date unknown

Archived copy, captured 2024-10-22: Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“we maintain a current list of specific CBRN capabilities of concern … we plan to share them with organizations such as AI Safety Institutes and the Frontier Model Forum”

Location in source PDF p. 20 (printed p. 16), Appendix C, footnote 21

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Anthropic
Version: Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0; effective date 2024-10-15. v2.0 identity is supplied by the official archive and later dated changelogs; the cover is not numbered.
Version date: 2024-10-15
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-09-18
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2024-10-22: Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0. Captured 7 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-10-22. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.
Attribution: Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (28 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Provision as stated in this edition, dated by the edition’s effective date.

Record ID ab-fw-rsp-v2-0-cbrn-capabilities-list-sharing