Claim · 2023-10-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The 2023 Screening Framework Guidance for Providers and Users of Synthetic Nucleic Acids states that advances in the field motivated the United States Government to review and revise the 2010 Screening Framework Guidance for Providers of Synthetic Double-Stranded DNA, and cites the 2010 guidance at 75 FR 62820.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Screening Framework Guidance for Providers and Users of Synthetic Nucleic Acids → supersedes version → Screening Framework Guidance for Providers of Synthetic Double-Stranded DNA

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Screening Framework Guidance for Providers and Users of Synthetic Nucleic Acidssupersedes version ↓Screening Framework Guidance for Providers of Synthetic Double-Stranded DNA

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Subject version: As published in the Federal Register of 13 October 2023 (88 FR 70998) · Published 2023-10-13 · Effective date not established
Object version: As published in the Federal Register of 13 October 2010 (75 FR 62820) · Published 2010-10-13 · Effective 2010-10-13
Date: 2023-10-13 · publication

Scope and limitsThe publisher's own statement that the later guidance revises the earlier one. The 2010 text and its history remain on record; what changed is recorded only where this pass states a provision of each expression. The pack’s change-evidence mode is not kept: the schema carries that field only on version change records, and the qualification already says that the supersession is the publisher’s own statement.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Screening Framework Guidance for Providers and Users of Synthetic Nucleic Acids (88 FR 70998)

Federal Register (Office of the Federal Register, National Archives) via govinfo.gov · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“These advances and others motivated the U.S. government to review and revise the 2010 Screening Framework Guidance for Providers of Synthetic Double-Stranded DNA.”

Location in source I. Introduction, 88 FR 70999

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Federal Register (Office of the Federal Register, National Archives) via govinfo.gov
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 20a3b9081d675539a0d8991d9021e5216ec373da9750df8711a4b55a47d54f16). Federal Register print of 13 October 2023, Vol. 88, No. 197, pp. 70998-71004, FR Doc. 2023-22540. The notice publishes the Guidance in full. Its technical sections (sequence screening methodology and the definitions that state screening criteria) were read but are not cited. Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 20a3b9081d675539a0d8991d9021e5216ec373da9750df8711a4b55a47d54f16, the same bytes).
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-28
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Federal Register (Office of the Federal Register, National Archives) via govinfo.gov, “Screening Framework Guidance for Providers and Users of Synthetic Nucleic Acids (88 FR 70998)”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (23 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The sentence carries footnote 3, which cites 75 FR 62820 (Oct. 13, 2010). A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 31) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A publisher-documented replacement within one framework family. Direction is newer version to predecessor; later publication alone is insufficient. This does not revise or retire dataset claims.

Date. Dated by the publication of the revising expression.

Record ID ab-scr-hhs-2023-supersedes-2010