Claim and evidence Close ×
Version 3.1 of the Harmonized Screening Protocol states that members reserve the right to refuse to fill any order and to notify other members, law enforcement or other authorities on identifying potentially problematic orders, and that a reporting duty applies to requests within a category of sequences the protocol defines, received from a suspicious potential customer or from one that fails to establish legitimacy under the protocol’s customer-screening practices. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Required action · provision ID igsc-harmonized-screening-protocol-refusal-reporting Subject version Version 3.1, dated 1 June 2026 · Published 2026-06-01 · Effective date not established Date 2026-06-01 · publication Scope and limits States what the protocol says members reserve the right to do and will do. No refusal, notification or report is recorded as having occurred, and the authorities named in the protocol are not listed here. The reporting duty is bounded to a defined category of requests, not to every request from such a customer (cross-family check, item 75); the category itself is a screening criterion and is not recorded.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
IGSC Harmonized Screening Protocol v3.1 ↗ International Gene Synthesis Consortium (genesynthesisconsortium.org) · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “IGSC members reserve the right to refuse to fill any order and to notify other IGSC members and/or law enforcement or other authorities upon identifying potentially problematic orders.” Location in source 7.4 Order Refusal and Reporting, requirement 4.1, p. 15
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-30
Source details and check notes Authors International Gene Synthesis Consortium (genesynthesisconsortium.org) Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 9f6ea4906da571f0fae88e6b24f3b68dfe485ff19b88f849882ebe56f03a2fd3). Version 3.1, dated 1 June 2026 on its first page, as served on 2026-10-28. Its screening-data and methodology sections (sections 6 and the appendices) were read but are not cited. Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 9f6ea4906da571f0fae88e6b24f3b68dfe485ff19b88f849882ebe56f03a2fd3, the same bytes). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution International Gene Synthesis Consortium (genesynthesisconsortium.org), “IGSC Harmonized Screening Protocol v3.1”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (28 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 75) re-read the record’s sources and found partial support; its corrections were applied at admission. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
IGSC Harmonized Screening Protocol v3.1 ↗ International Gene Synthesis Consortium (genesynthesisconsortium.org) · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase the reporting requirement covers requests within a category of sequences the protocol defines, received from a suspicious potential customer or from a potential customer failing to establish legitimacy under the protocol’s customer-screening practices.
Location in source 7.4 Order Refusal and Reporting, requirement 4.3, p. 15
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-30
Source details and check notes Authors International Gene Synthesis Consortium (genesynthesisconsortium.org) Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 9f6ea4906da571f0fae88e6b24f3b68dfe485ff19b88f849882ebe56f03a2fd3). Version 3.1, dated 1 June 2026 on its first page, as served on 2026-10-28. Its screening-data and methodology sections (sections 6 and the appendices) were read but are not cited. Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 9f6ea4906da571f0fae88e6b24f3b68dfe485ff19b88f849882ebe56f03a2fd3, the same bytes). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution International Gene Synthesis Consortium (genesynthesisconsortium.org), “IGSC Harmonized Screening Protocol v3.1”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The paraphrase is Selekoa’s, written from the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28; it is not a quotation and was not machine-matched. The paraphrase was narrowed at admission to the bounded policy scope, without the protocol’s own definition of the category (cross-family check, item 75). A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 75) re-read the record’s sources and found partial support; its corrections were applied at admission. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Provision as version 3.1 states it, dated by its publication.
Record ID ab-scr-igsc-hsp-v31-refusal-reporting