Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
No passage stating the provision “Senior-level decision-makers approve final uplift assessment” was found in Meta AASF · v2 within the inspected scope. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Reasoning and premises Premises: Meta FAF · v1.1 states this provision. The inspected scope of Meta AASF · v2 was: PDF pp. 1–44, all sections, footnotes and Appendix II – Change log. Method: Searched the text layer for 'uplift', 'senior', 'approv' and 'final assessment'; read §2.1–§2.3 and §3.3. No passage stating that a final assessment of uplift is approved by senior-level decision-makers was found. §2.1 AI Governance (PDF p. 4) says the centralized review process ensures senior decision-makers are involved throughout the lifecycle, and §2.1.2 (PDF p. 6) has the Chief AI Officer and Director of Alignment and Risk assign a risk threshold (recorded under a separate provision record). The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.
Provision Who decides · provision ID meta-uplift-assessment-approval Subject version v2.0 · Published 2026-04-08 · Effective date not established Date 2026-04-08 · publication Scope and limits A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ Meta · 2026-04-08
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Within the inspected scope, no passage stating the provision “Senior-level decision-makers approve final uplift assessment” was found.
Location in source PDF pp. 1–44, all sections, footnotes and Appendix II – Change log
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2; its change log dates the version April 7, 2026. The file served at the recorded address is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-04-08. Version date 2026-04-07 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured 1 day after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2 (2026). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03. Method: Searched the text layer for 'uplift', 'senior', 'approv' and 'final assessment'; read §2.1–§2.3 and §3.3. No passage stating that a final assessment of uplift is approved by senior-level decision-makers was found. §2.1 AI Governance (PDF p. 4) says the centralized review process ensures senior decision-makers are involved throughout the lifecycle, and §2.1.2 (PDF p. 6) has the Chief AI Officer and Director of Alignment and Risk assign a risk threshold (recorded under meta-threshold-assignment-authority). Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.
Date. Absence recorded for this edition, dated by its publication date.
Record ID absent-meta-aasf-v2-0-uplift-assessment-approval