Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
No passage stating the provision “CISO and CEO convened to decide on weight deletion” was found in RSP · v2.0 within the inspected scope. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Reasoning and premises Premises: RSP · 2023 states this provision. The inspected scope of RSP · v2.0 was: RSP v2.0 (effective October 15, 2024), whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–22: cover, summary and contents (pp. 1–4); Introduction and §§1–7 (pp. 5–17); Appendices A–C (pp. 18–20); Changelog (pp. 21–22). Method: Read §3.3, §4.3, §6 and §7 in full and searched the text layer case-insensitively for CISO, CEO, convene, delet, weights, lock down, post-mortem, next ASL and Containment. No passage stating that the CISO and CEO, or other stakeholders, are to be convened to determine whether the level of danger merits deletion of the weights of a model that has surpassed a capability level during training was found. Hits examined and not counted: §6.2 'Stronger restrictions' (PDF p. 15) states that, if interim measures cannot adequately mitigate risk, in the security context Anthropic will delete model weights, without naming who decides; §6.2 'Interim measures' (PDF p. 14) lets the CEO and RSO approve interim measures; §3.3 and §4.3 (PDF pp. 10, 13) have the CEO and RSO make capability and safeguards determinations; §7.1 item 1 (PDF p. 15) lists RSO duties including approving training or deployment decisions. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.
Provision Who decides · provision ID rsp-weights-deletion-decision Subject version v2.0 · Publication date unknown · Effective 2024-10-15 Date 2024-10-15 · effective Scope and limits A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2024-10-22: Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Within the inspected scope, no passage stating the provision “CISO and CEO convened to decide on weight deletion” was found.
Location in source RSP v2.0 (effective October 15, 2024), whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–22: cover, summary and contents (pp. 1–4); Introduction and §§1–7 (pp. 5–17); Appendices A–C (pp. 18–20); Changelog (pp. 21–22).
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0; effective date 2024-10-15. v2.0 identity is supplied by the official archive and later dated changelogs; the cover is not numbered. Version date 2024-10-15 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2024-10-22: Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0 ↗ . Captured 7 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-10-22. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03. Method: Read §3.3, §4.3, §6 and §7 in full and searched the text layer case-insensitively for CISO, CEO, convene, delet, weights, lock down, post-mortem, next ASL and Containment. No passage stating that the CISO and CEO, or other stakeholders, are to be convened to determine whether the level of danger merits deletion of the weights of a model that has surpassed a capability level during training was found. Hits examined and not counted: §6.2 'Stronger restrictions' (PDF p. 15) states that, if interim measures cannot adequately mitigate risk, in the security context Anthropic will delete model weights, without naming who decides; §6.2 'Interim measures' (PDF p. 14) lets the CEO and RSO approve interim measures; §3.3 and §4.3 (PDF pp. 10, 13) have the CEO and RSO make capability and safeguards determinations; §7.1 item 1 (PDF p. 15) lists RSO duties including approving training or deployment decisions. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.
Date. Absence recorded for this edition, dated by its effective date.
Record ID absent-rsp-v2-0-weights-deletion-decision