Claim · 2019-10-23 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Kryshtafovych et al. (Proteins, 23 October 2019) state that one group, A7D from DeepMind, appear to have very successfully deployed the technique of deriving residue-pair potentials and had the most accurate results overall in CASP13.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIII → states provision → CASP13: the A7D group from DeepMind had the most accurate results overall, as the organisers state

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIIIstates provision ↓CASP13: the A7D group from DeepMind had the most accurate results overall, as the organisers state

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID mod-casp13-a7d-result
Date: 2019-10-23 · publication Records dated 2019 →

Scope and limitsThe CASP organisers' statement in their overview of the round (the paper distinguishes the independent assessors, whose analyses are separate papers) about one participating group under its CASP group name, not DeepMind's own account and not a record of any particular score. The hedge "appear to have" is the authors' own. Read in the PMC author manuscript; 23 October 2019 is the date in PMC's "Published in final edited form" line, its kind not stated; issue December 2019.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIII

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics (author manuscript in PubMed Central) · 2019-10-23

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“One group, A7D from DeepMind … appear to have very successfully deployed this technique, and had the most accurate results overall.”

Location in source section "TEMPLATE FREE MODELING" (PMC author manuscript)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 9ccadedf01cf4ae96d3cceafa8985e512b6d787819383bca3c61da00933923f3). NIH author manuscript (PMC6927249) of Proteins 87(12):1011–1020; the publisher version of record was not retrieved.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-30
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Andriy Kryshtafovych, Torsten Schwede, Maya Topf, Krzysztof Fidelis, John Moult, “Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIII”, 2019-10-23.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI in biology (research/ai-in-biology). The quotation (20 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The ellipsis replaces the reference numeral 20 printed after "DeepMind". No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Date given in PMC's "Published in final edited form" line for the organisers' overview paper (kind not stated).

Record ID aib-mod-casp13-a7d-result