Claim and evidence Close ×
The Basel Committee’s newsletter of 16 March 2022 states that AI/ML models may be more difficult to manage than traditional models because they can be more complex, and names the extent to which model outcomes can be understood and explained as an area for continued discussion. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2022-03-16 · publication Records dated 2022 → Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits Informational; not supervisory guidance.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Newsletter on artificial intelligence and machine learning ↗ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Bank for International Settlements) · 2022-03-16
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “In some cases, AI/ML models may be more difficult to manage than traditional models as they can be more complex.” Location in source Second paragraph of the main text, beginning ‘In its discussions to date’
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 0e5a87118e3a65f3652f09495afbf43b216cdca2c2bd058d80e04e85af1c1d92). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). BIS HTML page as served on 2026-11-02 (requested at https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs_nl27.htm, redirected) Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Newsletter on artificial intelligence and machine learning”, 2022-03-16. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (20 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Newsletter on artificial intelligence and machine learning ↗ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Bank for International Settlements) · 2022-03-16
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The first area named for continuing discussions is the extent and degree to which the outcomes of models can be understood and explained.
Location in source First of the three areas listed for continuing discussions
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 0e5a87118e3a65f3652f09495afbf43b216cdca2c2bd058d80e04e85af1c1d92). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). BIS HTML page as served on 2026-11-02 (requested at https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs_nl27.htm, redirected) Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Newsletter on artificial intelligence and machine learning”, 2022-03-16. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The paraphrase is Selekoa’s, written from the text read for the candidate pack; it is not a quotation and was not machine-matched. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of publication, as the text gives it.
Record ID am-u04-bcbs-2022-newsletter-aiml