primary source Supports the claim
One Bank Research Agenda (discussion paper) ↗ Bank of England · 2015-02
Archived copy, captured 2015-03-19: One Bank Research Agenda (discussion paper) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The paper says that artificial intelligence techniques and big data offer ways to find new empirical relationships, and that textual information has been quantified systematically with machine-learning algorithms to study the communication of central-bank policy decisions and the spread of policy messages, analysis that could help show how consumer and financial sentiment evolves.
Location in source Theme 4, question 1 (“How can the potential of big data and other new data sets best be realised?”), paragraph spanning printed pp. 23–24
Machine-checked · 2026-11-07
Source details and check notes Authors Bank of England Version The 50-page discussion paper PDF dated February 2015, read by a model of another family on 2026-11-07 in the Internet Archive capture of 2015-03-19 (SHA-256 a1963d083b2d45b092c2bd129d96c8130b85f8abe892cd35bf48de5cfb2e15e2; research/reads-2026-11-07/codex-report.md, item 1). The original address now returns the Bank’s 404 page. Selekoa’s session of 2026-11-07 could not reach the archive (connection reset); it read the Bank’s launch announcement of 25 February 2015, which says the Bank published a supporting discussion paper that day, and the summary of the five themes, which does not carry the passages cited. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-07 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2015-03-19: One Bank Research Agenda (discussion paper) ↗ . An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2015-03-19. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-07.Attribution Bank of England, “One Bank Research Agenda” (discussion paper), February 2015. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and labelled paraphrases. Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes The checker’s reading, labelled as such: a model of another family read this paragraph on 2026-11-07 in the archive capture of 2015-03-19 (research/reads-2026-11-07/codex-report.md, item 1). Selekoa’s session could not reach the archive, and the paper is no longer served at its own address; the paraphrase is Selekoa’s, from the passages that report gives verbatim. Paraphrased because the paper’s length was not counted. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Launch of the agenda, when the Bank’s announcement says the discussion paper was published; the paper is dated February 2015.
Record ID am-u05-boe-2015-one-bank-research-agenda