Claim and evidence Close ×
The FSB report of 14 November 2024 states that existing financial policy frameworks address many of the vulnerabilities associated with AI adoption, but that additional work may be needed to ensure these frameworks are sufficiently comprehensive. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2024-11-14 · publication Records dated 2024 → Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits The report also invites authorities to assess whether current frameworks adequately address the vulnerabilities and notes that some authorities have adopted or are considering AI-specific guidance.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence ↗ Financial Stability Board · 2024-11-14
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Existing financial policy frameworks address many of the vulnerabilities associated with AI adoption, but additional work may be needed to ensure these frameworks are sufficiently comprehensive.” Location in source Section 5 “Conclusions”, PDF p. 33 (printed p. 29)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors Financial Stability Board Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 4b81544ecb28b50fb2fa5dab530a0f32c9351506a875d1de841b946d18e7ecef). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). PDF dated 14 November 2024 as served by fsb.org on 2026-11-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution Financial Stability Board, “The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence”, 2024-11-14. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (26 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence ↗ Financial Stability Board · 2024-11-14
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Existing regulatory and supervisory frameworks already require FIs to address cyber and operational risks, as well as to manage model and third-party risks.” Location in source Section 5, PDF p. 33 (printed p. 29)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors Financial Stability Board Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 4b81544ecb28b50fb2fa5dab530a0f32c9351506a875d1de841b946d18e7ecef). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). PDF dated 14 November 2024 as served by fsb.org on 2026-11-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution Financial Stability Board, “The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence”, 2024-11-14. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (23 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of publication, as the text gives it.
Record ID am-u12-fsb-2024-ai