Claim and evidence Close ×
The FSB final report of 15 October 2026 on sound practices for responsible AI adoption states that the FSB and relevant standard-setting bodies emphasise proportionate, risk-based and technology-neutral approaches, and that its sound practices are non-binding and can be integrated into existing frameworks. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source; Context: primary · 1 source
Date 2026-10-15 · publication Records dated 2026 → Role Context Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Missing element The passages state technology-neutral, proportionate approaches and that the sound practices are non-binding; they do not state that existing financial regulatory and supervisory frameworks broadly cover AI. Where the report speaks of existing frameworks (PDF pp. 6 and 37), it means financial institutions’ own risk frameworks, which they adapt to AI. Scope and limits Recorded as context after a check by a model of another family. The report also notes that some standard-setting bodies have issued AI-specific guidance and that some risks of agentic AI are newer; the record does not show that no AI-specific rules exist or are needed.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Sound Practices for Responsible Adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Final report ↗ Financial Stability Board · 2026-10-15
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “The FSB and relevant SSBs emphasise proportionate, risk‑based and technology‑neutral approaches to monitoring and addressing risks” Location in source Section 1.1, PDF p. 9 (printed p. 5)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors Financial Stability Board Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 4e3ea6d2f52439f8aef6a27fc316a20eecacecd50b03dfca4e89f9f1de0ca6de). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). PDF dated 15 October 2026 as served by fsb.org on 2026-11-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution Financial Stability Board, “Sound Practices for Responsible Adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Final report”, 2026-10-15. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (16 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. primary source Context only
Sound Practices for Responsible Adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Final report ↗ Financial Stability Board · 2026-10-15
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “The sound practices are non-prescriptive and do not constitute a binding international standard.” Location in source Executive summary, PDF p. 6 (printed p. 2)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors Financial Stability Board Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 4e3ea6d2f52439f8aef6a27fc316a20eecacecd50b03dfca4e89f9f1de0ca6de). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). PDF dated 15 October 2026 as served by fsb.org on 2026-11-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution Financial Stability Board, “Sound Practices for Responsible Adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Final report”, 2026-10-15. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (13 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. Date of publication, as the text gives it.
Record ID am-u12-fsb-2026-ai-sound-practices-context