Claim · 2019-05-25 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The Beijing AI Principles' 'Control Risks' principle states that continuous efforts should be made to improve the maturity, robustness, reliability and controllability of AI systems, for data security and the safety of the system and its environment.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Beijing AI Principles (人工智能北京共识) → states provision → Control Risks: continuous efforts to improve the maturity, robustness, reliability and controllability of AI systems

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Beijing AI Principles (人工智能北京共识)states provision ↓Control Risks: continuous efforts to improve the maturity, robustness, reliability and controllability of AI systems

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID baai-bjp-control-risks
Date: 2019-05-25 · publication Records dated 2019 →

Scope and limitsQuoted from the English text on the International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance's website; the Chinese original, located by the cross-family check in an archive capture, was not compared with this wording. What the principles state, not implementation.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text)

International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance (ai-ethics-and-governance.institute) · Publication date unknown

Archived copy, captured 2022-01-20: Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Continuous efforts should be made to improve the maturity, robustness, reliability, and controllability of AI systems”

Location in source Research and Development, 'Control Risks'

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance
Version: Undated page, retrieved on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 049d7d29a154c415aead0a2b904a2efd4587308674bce8c656a145f3703e63a9) directly from the publisher. Version: ai-ethics-and-governance.institute/beijing-artificial-intelligence-principles/. English text of the principles with a 'Release and Endorsement' note, on the website of the research centre that names the principles' lead drafter; not a BAAI domain and undated. Read as served on 29 October 2026. The Chinese original (人工智能北京共识) was not retrieved. Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated. The cross-family check (2026-10-31) located the Internet Archive capture of 2022-01-20 linked here; a capture shows only what the archive retrieved that day. Exact-URL capture located by the cross-family check.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-29
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2022-01-20: Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text). No publication date is recorded for this source. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2022-01-20. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-29.
Attribution: International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance, “Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text)”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). The quotation (16 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day, read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Release date of the principles; wording read from the undated English text as served on 29 October 2026.

Record ID c3-baai-bjp-control-risks