Claim and evidence Close ×
Beijing AI Principles (人工智能北京共识) states provision ↓ Release and endorsement: released on 25 May 2019 and endorsed on the day of release by universities, research institutes and an industry alliance, named as examples The 'Release and Endorsement' note published with the English text of the Beijing AI Principles states that they were released on 25 May 2019 and endorsed on the day of release by universities, national research institutions and AITISA, naming Tsinghua University, Peking University and two Chinese Academy of Sciences institutes as examples. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Statement · provision ID baai-bjp-endorsers Date 2019-05-25 · publication Records dated 2019 → Scope and limits The note gives examples ('e.g.', 'etc.'), not a complete list, so no count is recorded. Endorsement is recorded as the note states it; it does not establish adoption or implementation by the named bodies. The note also names Yi Zeng (Chinese Academy of Sciences) as lead drafter; that credit comes from his own centre's website and is not recorded as a separate claim. The note belongs to the English expression; the Chinese original located by the cross-family check was not compared on this point.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text) ↗ International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance (ai-ethics-and-governance.institute) · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2022-01-20: Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The note states that, on the day of release, the principles were endorsed by leading universities (Tsinghua University, Peking University), national research institutions (the Institute of Automation and the Institute of Computing Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the Artificial Intelligence Industry Technology Innovation Strategic Alliance (AITISA), among others.
Location in source Section 'Release and Endorsement'
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance Version Undated page, retrieved on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 049d7d29a154c415aead0a2b904a2efd4587308674bce8c656a145f3703e63a9) directly from the publisher. Version: ai-ethics-and-governance.institute/beijing-artificial-intelligence-principles/. English text of the principles with a 'Release and Endorsement' note, on the website of the research centre that names the principles' lead drafter; not a BAAI domain and undated. Read as served on 29 October 2026. The Chinese original (人工智能北京共识) was not retrieved. Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated. The cross-family check (2026-10-31) located the Internet Archive capture of 2022-01-20 linked here; a capture shows only what the archive retrieved that day. Exact-URL capture located by the cross-family check. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2022-01-20: Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text) ↗ . No publication date is recorded for this source. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2022-01-20. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-29.Attribution International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance, “Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text)”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). The paraphrase’s verbatim anchor matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day, read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The paraphrase is Selekoa’s; only the anchor is the source’s wording. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-31, item K013) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Release date of the principles as the note states it; the note itself is undated and was read as served on 29 October 2026.
Record ID c3-baai-bjp-endorsers