Claim and evidence Close ×
Beijing AI Principles (人工智能北京共识) states provision ↓ Long-term Planning: continuous research on the potential risks of augmented intelligence, AGI and superintelligence The Beijing AI Principles' 'Long-term Planning' principle states that continuous research on the potential risks of augmented intelligence, artificial general intelligence and superintelligence should be encouraged. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source; Context: primary · 1 source
Provision Statement · provision ID baai-bjp-long-term-planning Date 2019-05-25 · publication Records dated 2019 → Scope and limits Quoted from the English text on the International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance's website, whose wording, 'potential risks', the cross-family check also found in BAAI's own English page in a capture of 2 June 2019. The Chinese original (长远规划) encourages continuous research on the potential impacts (潜在影响) of augmented intelligence, general intelligence and superintelligence, a broader term than risks. The two expressions are kept as distinct wordings; the Chinese is recorded as context from the cross-family check's reading of an archive capture. What the principles state, not implementation.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text) ↗ International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance (ai-ethics-and-governance.institute) · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2022-01-20: Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Continuous research on the potential risks of Augmented Intelligence, Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Superintelligence should be encouraged.” Location in source Governance, 'Long-term Planning'
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance Version Undated page, retrieved on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 049d7d29a154c415aead0a2b904a2efd4587308674bce8c656a145f3703e63a9) directly from the publisher. Version: ai-ethics-and-governance.institute/beijing-artificial-intelligence-principles/. English text of the principles with a 'Release and Endorsement' note, on the website of the research centre that names the principles' lead drafter; not a BAAI domain and undated. Read as served on 29 October 2026. The Chinese original (人工智能北京共识) was not retrieved. Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated. The cross-family check (2026-10-31) located the Internet Archive capture of 2022-01-20 linked here; a capture shows only what the archive retrieved that day. Exact-URL capture located by the cross-family check. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2022-01-20: Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text) ↗ . No publication date is recorded for this source. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2022-01-20. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-29.Attribution International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance, “Beijing Artificial Intelligence Principles (English text)”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). The quotation (18 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day, read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-31, item K014) re-read the record’s sources directly and found full support. No human editorial review. primary source Context only
人工智能北京共识 ↗ 北京智源人工智能研究院 (www.baai.ac.cn) · 2019-05-25 · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Archived copy, captured 2020-08-11: 人工智能北京共识 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The Chinese original's 长远规划 principle encourages continuous research on the potential impacts (潜在影响) of augmented intelligence, general intelligence and superintelligence; it does not say potential risks.
Location in source 治理 (Governance), 长远规划 (Long-term Planning)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors 北京智源人工智能研究院 (Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence) Version Chinese text of the Beijing AI Principles on BAAI's site, dated 25 May 2019 on the page. Not retrieved for the candidate pack (the address now serves a script shell) or at admission (the Internet Archive refused this environment); read by the cross-family machine check on 2026-10-31 in the Internet Archive capture of 11 August 2020 linked here. A capture authenticates the wording only as the archive retrieved it that day, not on the day of release. No quotation is taken from it; its passages are recorded as paraphrases of the check's reading. English title (machine translation): “Beijing AI Principles”. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2020-08-11: 人工智能北京共识 ↗ . Captured 444 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2020-08-11. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-31.Attribution 北京智源人工智能研究院 (Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence), “人工智能北京共识”, 2019-05-25. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and editorial paraphrases; no quotation is taken from this capture. Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Added at the admission of the Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). As for the Be Responsible principle: the cross-family machine check (2026-10-31) quoted this principle from the Internet Archive capture of 11 August 2020 of BAAI's page, and found that 潜在影响 (potential impacts) is broader than the English expression's 'potential risks'. This admission could not repeat the reading. The passage is Selekoa's paraphrase of what the check reported, with the original term in parentheses, not a quotation. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-31, item K014) re-read the record’s sources directly and found full support. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Release date of the principles; wording read from the undated English text as served on 29 October 2026.
Record ID c3-baai-bjp-long-term-planning