Claim and evidence Close ×
SenseTime’s 2023 large-model ethics white paper calls on all parties to keep a “dynamic balance” and avoid falling into an “out-of-control race” in both AI development and risk governance, and makes four proposals, among them strengthening international cooperation on AI governance. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Statement · provision ID sensetime-llm-ethics-race Date 2024-03-20 · publication Records dated 2024 → Scope and limits The section refers to the Future of Life Institute’s March 2023 open letter; the report’s phrase is its own, and no endorsement or opposition of that letter is recorded. The four proposals are recommendations.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
日日新，思无邪 商汤大模型伦理原则与实践白皮书（人工智能伦理治理年度报告（2023）） ↗ SenseTime AI Ethics and Governance Committee (via oss.sensetime.com) · 2024-03-20 · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “都应避免陷入“失控的竞赛”之中。为此，我们愿就生成式人工智能治理的推进提出以下几点倡议” Location in source Section 6 (p. 29)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors 商汤人工智能伦理与治理委员会; 商汤智能产业研究院; 上海交通大学计算法学与 AI 伦理研究中心 Version Dated document, retrieved on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 e1239d4be7611047a4355ce4e3c560897099597647c1aa7703bb9dbaedf435dc) directly from the publisher. Version: 商汤大模型伦理原则与实践白皮书.pdf (oss.sensetime.com/20240320/eed5f650…). PDF linked from the company ethics page, where it is dated 2024-03-20 (also the date in the file path). The report says it was initially released in Chinese in July 2023; whether the file differs from a July 2023 release was not checked. English title (machine translation): “Ri Ri Xin, Si Wu Xie: SenseTime White Paper on Large-Model Ethics Principles and Practice (AI Ethics and Governance Annual Report 2023)”. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans) Attribution 商汤人工智能伦理与治理委员会, 商汤智能产业研究院, 上海交通大学计算法学与 AI 伦理研究中心, “日日新，思无邪 商汤大模型伦理原则与实践白皮书（人工智能伦理治理年度报告（2023））”, 2024-03-20. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). The quotation (39 words, each CJK character counted as one) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day, read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. English machine translation, not verified by a person: “should avoid falling into an “out-of-control race”. To this end, we wish to put forward the following proposals on advancing generative AI governance”. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-31, item K029) re-read the record’s sources directly and found full support. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
日日新，思无邪 商汤大模型伦理原则与实践白皮书（人工智能伦理治理年度报告（2023）） ↗ SenseTime AI Ethics and Governance Committee (via oss.sensetime.com) · 2024-03-20 · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “三是加强人工智能治理国际合作。各国监管机构应加强生成式人工智能监管协调” Location in source Section 6, third proposal (p. 30)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-31
Source details and check notes Authors 商汤人工智能伦理与治理委员会; 商汤智能产业研究院; 上海交通大学计算法学与 AI 伦理研究中心 Version Dated document, retrieved on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 e1239d4be7611047a4355ce4e3c560897099597647c1aa7703bb9dbaedf435dc) directly from the publisher. Version: 商汤大模型伦理原则与实践白皮书.pdf (oss.sensetime.com/20240320/eed5f650…). PDF linked from the company ethics page, where it is dated 2024-03-20 (also the date in the file path). The report says it was initially released in Chinese in July 2023; whether the file differs from a July 2023 release was not checked. English title (machine translation): “Ri Ri Xin, Si Wu Xie: SenseTime White Paper on Large-Model Ethics Principles and Practice (AI Ethics and Governance Annual Report 2023)”. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-29 Language Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans) Attribution 商汤人工智能伦理与治理委员会, 商汤智能产业研究院, 上海交通大学计算法学与 AI 伦理研究中心, “日日新，思无邪 商汤大模型伦理原则与实践白皮书（人工智能伦理治理年度报告（2023））”, 2024-03-20. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). The quotation (34 words, each CJK character counted as one) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day, read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. English machine translation, not verified by a person: “Third, strengthen international cooperation on AI governance. Regulators of all countries should strengthen coordination of generative AI regulation”. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-31, item K029) re-read the record’s sources directly and found full support. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Statement in the cited PDF, dated 20 March 2024 on SenseTime's ethics page. The report says it was first released in Chinese in July 2023; whether that release had the same wording was not checked.
Record ID c3-sensetime-llm-ethics-race