Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Anthropic reported cloud terms with ↓ Amazon Web Services
The CMA describes Anthropic’s agreement for AWS compute capacity as non-exclusive. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2024-09-27 · snapshot Transaction type cloud services Relationship context external Stage contracted Scope and limits Non-exclusivity coexists with AWS primary-provider status. It does not establish easy switching, provider shares or absence of dependence. The CMA decision did not decide material influence.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Amazon.com, Inc. partnership with Anthropic PBC: full text decision ↗ Competition and Markets Authority · 2024-10-17
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The compute agreement is non-exclusive and AWS is described as the primary provider.
Location in source Full text decision, p. 4, paragraph 12(b)
Machine-checked · 2026-09-25
Source details and check notes Authors Competition and Markets Authority Version ME/7100/24; decision issued 2024-09-27, public redacted full text published 2024-10-17. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-25 Language English (en) Attribution Competition and Markets Authority, Amazon.com, Inc. partnership with Anthropic PBC: full text decision. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and short attributed paraphrases; no redistribution of source documents. Check notes Direct inspection of the cited passage; machine check only. Non-exclusivity coexists with AWS primary-provider status. It does not establish easy switching, provider shares or absence of dependence. The CMA decision did not decide material influence. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A dated cloud agreement provision, including scoped exclusivity or capacity rights. Does not assert current continuity or payment.
Date. Dated description of contractual terms, not an inferred signing date or current arrangement.
Record ID capital-ii-anthropic-aws-nonexclusive-2024