Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
On 18 July 2025 Joel Kaplan, Meta’s global affairs chief according to CNBC, wrote on LinkedIn that Meta had reviewed the European Commission’s Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models and would not sign it. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary + secondary · 2 sources
Object version Final version (10 July 2025) · Published 2025-07-10 · Effective date not established Date 2025-07-18 · announcement Scope and limits A public statement that Meta would not sign; it is not a finding about Meta’s practices or legal obligations. The post’s reasons (legal uncertainty and measures it says go beyond the AI Act) are not recorded, and whether the Code goes beyond the Act is set aside.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI (LinkedIn post) ↗ LinkedIn (post by Joel Kaplan of Meta) · 2025-07-18
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Meta won’t be signing it” Location in source Post text, first paragraph
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors Joel Kaplan Version Public post page inspected 2026-10-04 without signing in; the page metadata gives datePublished 2025-07-18T11:00:05Z and the post is marked as edited. No archive copy is cited. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-04 Language English (en) Attribution Joel Kaplan, LinkedIn post of 18 July 2025. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending. secondary source Supports the claim
Meta says it won’t sign Europe AI agreement, calling it an overreach that will stunt growth ↗ CNBC · 2025-07-18
Archived copy, captured 2025-07-18: Meta says it won’t sign Europe AI agreement, calling it an overreach that will stunt growth ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase CNBC reports that Meta Platforms said it would not sign the EU’s AI code of practice, citing a LinkedIn post by its global affairs chief Joel Kaplan.
Location in source Key points
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors Samantha Subin Version Article published Fri, Jul 18 2025 11:22 AM EDT and updated 1:53 PM EDT, inspected live 2026-10-04; an Internet Archive capture of 2025-07-18 exists and was not compared. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-04 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-07-18: Meta says it won’t sign Europe AI agreement, calling it an overreach that will stunt growth ↗ . Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-07-18. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.Attribution Samantha Subin, CNBC (18 July 2025). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Editorial paraphrase, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression. The integrating session wrote or selected this passage from its own reading of the source; it does not repeat a passage from the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An organisation publicly stated that it would not sign a commitment text. The record is the statement, not a finding about the organisation’s practices or legal obligations.
Date. Date of the LinkedIn post (page metadata) and of CNBC’s report.
Record ID cm-eu-code-declined-meta