Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
100 people, organisations and other records · 129 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
No passage meeting the comparison question “Stated changes from the previous edition” was found in FSF · v3.0 within the inspected scope. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Reasoning and premises Premises: the comparison question asks for the following. The edition’s own statement (changelog, introduction or summary) of what changed from its predecessor. Not applicable to the first edition in a sequence. The inspected scope of FSF · v3.0 was: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–16 (all sections, tables, footnotes and §5.3 read). Method: the edition was read in full and its text layer searched case-insensitively for version 2 / version 1, previous, chang, introduc, this update / updated. Hits examined and not counted: §5.3 “Past Updates and Changes” (PDF p. 16) lists only Version 2.0 (4 February 2025) and Version 1.0 (17 May 2024), with no description of changes. “previous” (PDF p. 5) refers to a previous risk assessment. “chang” hits describe possible future change (PDF pp. 2, 10), changes in model capabilities, in risk or in understanding of risk (PDF pp. 5, 9, 13), the harmful manipulation CCL's capacity to alter beliefs and behaviour (PDF p. 11), and a contents entry (PDF p. 3). “updated” hits concern safety cases (PDF pp. 9, 13) and the future update process (PDF p. 16). No “introduc” hits. The edition contains no statement of what changed from v2.0; the dataset's harmful-manipulation change claim rests on a separate announcement, not on this text. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.
Provision Revision · provision ID comparison-d8-changes Subject version v3.0 · Published 2025-09-22 · Effective date not established Date 2025-09-22 · publication Scope and limits A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Frontier Safety Framework — v3.0 ↗ Google DeepMind · 2025-09-22
Archived copy, captured 2025-09-22: Frontier Safety Framework — v3.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the comparison question “Stated changes from the previous edition” was found.
Location in source FSF · v3.0: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–16 (all sections, tables, footnotes and §5.3 read)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-26
Source details and check notes Authors Google DeepMind Version Frontier Safety Framework v3.0; publication date 2025-09-22. Version date 2025-09-22 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-09-22: Frontier Safety Framework — v3.0 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-09-22. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Google DeepMind, Frontier Safety Framework — v3.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-15 for the framework comparison, audited in a fresh context, checked by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-15 and re-checked on 2026-10-26. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.
Date. Absence recorded for this edition, dated by its publication date.
Record ID cmp-fsf-v3-0-d8-changes