Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
100 people, organisations and other records · 129 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Meta AASF · v2 states a provision on the comparison question “Autonomy, self-improvement or AI research and development”. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Risk domain · provision ID comparison-d1-autonomy Subject version v2.0 · Published 2026-04-08 · Effective date not established Date 2026-04-08 · publication Scope and limits Meta names one domain, Loss of Control, which the edition frames as failures of critical control mechanisms (PDF p. 22). Its outcome Loss of Control 1 rests on autonomous AI research and development and evaluation awareness, which the edition lists as example enabling capabilities of a control failure rather than as domains of their own (PDF pp. 22–23), with capability checkpoints in §4.2.3; it is recorded here. Its outcome Loss of Control 2, AI undermining monitoring, is recorded under “Other named domains” under the “Risk domains covered” overlap rule. Self-exfiltration and autonomous replication appear only as illustrative emerging threat scenarios (PDF p. 38). What the edition states, paraphrased from the cited expression with its page. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness, and a shared question does not make two editions’ provisions equivalent.
The evidence 03 primary source Supports the claim
Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ Meta · 2026-04-08
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The edition says the Framework currently concentrates on catastrophic risk in three areas: chemical and biological, cybersecurity, and “Loss of Control”.
Location in source PDF p. 1 (unnumbered opening page), second paragraph, second sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-27
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2; its change log dates the version April 7, 2026. The file served at the recorded address is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-04-08. Version date 2026-04-07 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured 1 day after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2 (2026). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Explicit paraphrase, written on 2026-10-27 by an automated research assistant after re-reading the passage in the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. The comparison quoted the passage; it is given here as a paraphrase to keep the edition within the quotation limit. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ Meta · 2026-04-08
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase For the outcome “Loss of Control 1”, the edition gives as a threat scenario that AI development speeds up so that new capabilities and behaviours appear faster than the organisation's evaluation processes.
Location in source PDF pp. 22–23, §3.4.3 Loss of Control, table row 'Loss of Control 1', Potential Threat Scenario column
Machine-checked · 2026-10-27
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2; its change log dates the version April 7, 2026. The file served at the recorded address is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-04-08. Version date 2026-04-07 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured 1 day after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2 (2026). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Explicit paraphrase, written on 2026-10-27 by an automated research assistant after re-reading the passage in the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. The comparison quoted the passage; it is given here as a paraphrase to keep the edition within the quotation limit. The table cell continues across the page break. The outcome is named “Loss of Control 1”: losing the ability to evaluate whether AI is safe before it is deployed. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ Meta · 2026-04-08
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase In the same row, the edition lists “Autonomous AI R&D” as an example enabling capability: the ability to complete, autonomously and consistently, tasks representative of a researcher's work to advance AI development.
Location in source PDF pp. 22–23, §3.4.3 Loss of Control, table row 'Loss of Control 1', Example Enabling Capabilities column
Machine-checked · 2026-10-27
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2; its change log dates the version April 7, 2026. The file served at the recorded address is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-04-08. Version date 2026-04-07 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured 1 day after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2 (2026). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Explicit paraphrase, written on 2026-10-27 by an automated research assistant after re-reading the passage in the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. The comparison quoted the passage; it is given here as a paraphrase to keep the edition within the quotation limit. The table cell continues across the page break. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Comparison cell for this edition, dated by the edition’s publication date.
Record ID cmp-meta-aasf-v2-0-d1-autonomy