Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Meta AASF · v2 states a provision on the comparison question “Pause, non-deployment or non-training”. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Required action · provision ID comparison-d3-halt Subject version v2.0 · Published 2026-04-08 · Effective date not established Date 2026-04-08 · publication Scope and limits Applies to either critical-threshold scenario. Development and deployment are conditioned on validated mitigations rather than stopped; for cyber, a model meeting the simple-suite threshold is provisionally rated high and 'such deployment will not be implemented' until complex evaluation is complete (PDF p. 29); the change log records the critical measure changing from 'Stop' to 'Develop with Mitigations' (see “Stated changes from the previous edition”). What the edition states, quoted from the cited expression. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness, and a shared question does not make two editions’ provisions equivalent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ Meta · 2026-04-08
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Should either scenario arise, we will only continue development of the Frontier AI if our risk assessments are complete and safeguards are defined, implemented and validated to reduce risk to the moderate or lower risk threshold.” Location in source PDF p. 17 (printed p. 17), §3.3 Risk Thresholds, final sentence of the paragraph beginning on PDF p. 16 ('First, a Frontier AI meets the critical risk threshold…')
Machine-checked · 2026-10-27
Source details and check notes Authors Meta Version Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2; its change log dates the version April 7, 2026. The file served at the recorded address is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-04-08. Version date 2026-04-07 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-08: Advanced AI Scaling Framework — Version 2 ↗ . Captured 1 day after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Meta, Advanced AI Scaling Framework, Version 2 (2026). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Existing dataset passage for this edition, which contains the comparison’s shorter quotation, first checked on 2026-10-03. The comparison’s quotation was checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-27 against the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. Opens 'Should either scenario arise' (the two critical-threshold scenarios); the sentence continues 'to reduce risk to the moderate or lower risk threshold'. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Comparison cell for this edition, dated by the edition’s publication date.
Record ID cmp-meta-aasf-v2-0-d3-halt