Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
100 people, organisations and other records · 129 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
No passage meeting the comparison question “Other named domains” was found in Microsoft FGF · Feb 2025 within the inspected scope. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Reasoning and premises Premises: the comparison question asks for the following. Any further domain the edition names as tracked (for example misalignment, deceptive behaviour, sabotage of oversight). Research categories or monitored-only domains are recorded with their status as worded. Overlap rule: loss of control or misalignment defined through deception or undermining human oversight is recorded here; autonomy, self-replication and AI research and development go under “Autonomy, self-improvement or AI research and development”. The inspected scope of Microsoft FGF · Feb 2025 was: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–15 (p. 16 blank): all sections, both appendices read. Method: the edition was read in full and its text layer searched case-insensitively for speculative, potential capability-related risks, bias, misalign, loss of control, broader set of risks. Hits examined and not counted: PDF p. 3: the statement that research continues on capabilities that are longer-term or more speculative names no domain. PDF p. 4: the statement that Microsoft keeps studying potential risks related to capabilities names none. PDF p. 5: the broader set of risks refers to the broader AI governance programme. PDF p. 9: bias or discrimination are residual risks for deployers to address, not tracked domains. No match for 'misalign' or 'loss of control'. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.
Provision Risk domain · provision ID comparison-d1-other Subject version Feb 2025 (Version 1) · Published 2025-02 · Effective date not established Date 2025-02 · publication Scope and limits A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025) ↗ Microsoft · 2025-02
Archived copy, captured 2025-02-26: Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the comparison question “Other named domains” was found.
Location in source Microsoft FGF · Feb 2025: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–15 (p. 16 blank): all sections, both appendices read
Machine-checked · 2026-10-26
Source details and check notes Authors Microsoft Version Frontier Governance Framework, Version 1 (February 2025); its change log reads “8 February 2025 – First version”. The file served at the recorded address (last modified 2025-02-12) is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2025-02-26, the earliest located. Version date 2025-02-08 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-03 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-02-26: Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025) ↗ . Captured 18 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-02-26. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-03.Attribution Microsoft, Frontier Governance Framework, Version 1 (February 2025). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-15 for the framework comparison, audited in a fresh context, checked by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-15 and re-checked on 2026-10-26. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.
Date. Absence recorded for this edition, dated by its publication date.
Record ID cmp-ms-fgf-2025-d1-other