Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
100 people, organisations and other records · 129 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
No passage meeting the comparison question “Public or external reporting” was found in Preparedness · Beta within the inspected scope. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Inferred Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Reasoning and premises Premises: the comparison question asks for the following. Disclosure the edition says it will make to the public, to governments, or to other external parties, excluding publication of the framework itself (recorded under “Revision”). The inspected scope of Preparedness · Beta was: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–27 (all sections read). Method: the edition was read in full and its text layer searched case-insensitively for publish, public, disclos, government, report, system card, share, external. Hits examined and not counted: The mention of organisations publishing Responsible Scaling Policies (PDF p. 3) describes other organisations. 'public' (PDF p. 9 and elsewhere) occurs in threshold definitions (disruption of public life). 'report' hits concern internal reports to the SAG, Leadership and Board (recorded under “Transparency and reporting” Internal reporting). System cards are named only as an existing safety process (PDF p. 20). 'External access' (PDF p. 25): the edition says it will continue to give external researchers and government access to model releases for red-teaming and testing; this concerns access to models, not disclosure of reports, evaluations or decisions. Adjacent passages recorded as context: alerting distribution partners (PDF p. 14, Mitigations, first paragraph) is listed as one possible mitigation, and the Accountability section states that qualified, independent third parties will audit Scorecard evaluations and mitigations to check that results are reported accurately (PDF p. 25, 'Audits'); neither is a disclosure commitment. No commitment to disclose Scorecard results, decisions or reports to the public or to governments was found. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.
Provision Reporting · provision ID comparison-d7-external Subject version Beta · Published 2023-12-18 · Effective date not established Date 2023-12-18 · publication Scope and limits Access for external researchers and government to test model releases (PDF p. 25) is external engagement, not disclosure; it is recorded here as context. A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Preparedness Framework — Beta ↗ OpenAI · 2023-12-18
Archived copy, captured 2023-12-18: Preparedness Framework — Beta ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the comparison question “Public or external reporting” was found.
Location in source Preparedness · Beta: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–27 (all sections read).
Machine-checked · 2026-10-26
Source details and check notes Authors OpenAI Version Preparedness Framework Beta; publication date 2023-12-18. Version date 2023-12-18 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2023-12-18: Preparedness Framework — Beta ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2023-12-18. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution OpenAI, Preparedness Framework — Beta. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-15 for the framework comparison, audited in a fresh context, checked by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-15 and re-checked on 2026-10-26. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.
Date. Absence recorded for this edition, dated by its publication date.
Record ID cmp-preparedness-beta-2023-d7-external