Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
100 people, organisations and other records · 129 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
RSP · v3.1 states a provision on the comparison question “Other named domains”. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Risk domain · provision ID comparison-d1-other Subject version v3.1 · Publication date unknown · Effective 2026-04-02 Date 2026-04-02 · effective Scope and limits A threshold row on sabotage by AI systems. Its industry-wide column calls for compartmentalization, monitoring, capability assessments and evidence on whether models tend to deceive, manipulate or sabotage their users. What the edition states, paraphrased from the cited expression with its page. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness, and a shared question does not make two editions’ provisions equivalent.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.1 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2026-04-07: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.1 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The edition’s threshold table has a row titled “High-stakes sabotage opportunities”.
Location in source PDF p. 7, §1, threshold table, row title, left column (“Capability or usage threshold”)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-27
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.1; effective date 2026-04-02. Version date 2026-04-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-04-07: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.1 ↗ . Captured 5 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-04-07. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.1. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Explicit paraphrase, written on 2026-10-27 by an automated research assistant after re-reading the passage in the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. The comparison quoted the passage; it is given here as a paraphrase to keep the edition within the quotation limit. The row concerns AI systems that are heavily relied on, have wide access to sensitive assets and a moderate ability to act autonomously toward goals and to use subterfuge, such that they could plausibly carry out sabotage that irreversibly and substantially raises the chance of a global catastrophe later on. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Comparison cell for this edition, dated by the edition’s effective date.
Record ID cmp-rsp-v3-1-d1-other