Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
The ChatGLM report describes instruction tuning followed by SFT and RLHF, with ChatGPT explicitly named as a motivation. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2024-06-18 · publication Scope and limits Retrospective authors’ account in §1. It does not establish model copying, a corporate relationship or independently verified training performance.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools ↗ Team GLM · 2024-06-18
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The authors say ChatGPT motivated their subsequent use of SFT and RLHF.
Location in source §1 Introduction, paragraph beginning Following this
Machine-checked · 2026-09-29
Source details and check notes Authors Team GLM Version Source language: English (en). arXiv:2406.12793v1; joint Zhipu AI / Tsinghua University affiliation. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-29 Language English (en) Attribution Team GLM, ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools (2024-06-18). Reuse No redistribution licence asserted for this source expression. Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases only; model licensing is distinct from source-document reuse. Check notes English source paraphrased and checked by machine. Exploratory seed, not editorially accepted. Source reporting is not independent verification of implementation. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. The concept is explicitly discussed in the document. This makes no earliest-use, invention or transmission claim.
Date. Date of this source expression or announcement, not a separately verified implementation date.
Record ID cn-chatglm-rlhf