Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Article 17 of the Measures provides that providers of generative AI services with public-opinion attributes or social-mobilisation capacity shall carry out a security assessment in accordance with relevant state provisions and complete the algorithm filing, change and cancellation procedures under the Provisions on the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations in Internet Information Services. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Required action · provision ID cn-genai-security-assessment Subject version Order No. 15, dated 10 July 2023 · Published 2023-07-10 · Effective 2023-08-15 Date 2023-07-10 · publication Scope and limits English rendering by a machine agent from the Chinese text, which controls; the rendering of “舆论属性或者社会动员能力” is a translation choice. The text does not say which services have these attributes, and no record shows that any frontier developer’s service was assessed or filed. It states what the text provides, not whether any named developer falls within it or complies. A document’s statement is not evidence of implementation, compliance or enforcement.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services) ↗ 中国网信网 (Cyberspace Administration of China website) · 2023-07-13 · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “提供具有舆论属性或者社会动员能力的生成式人工智能服务的，应当按照国家有关规定开展安全评估，并按照《互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定》履行算法备案和变更、注销备案手续。” Location in source Article 17 (第十七条)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-11
Source details and check notes Authors 国家互联网信息办公室 (Cyberspace Administration of China) and six other departments Version Web page of the Cyberspace Administration of China dated 2023-07-13, retrieved 2026-10-11. It carries Order No. 15 dated 2023-07-10 and the Measures in Chinese. A second official posting (gov.cn gazette) was not retrieved. No archive capture is cited: the Internet Archive refused lookup requests (HTTP 429) on 2026-10-11, so none was checked. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-11 Language Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans) Attribution 国家互联网信息办公室 等七部门, 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (2023-07-10). Reuse Official document; no redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim quote, matched mechanically (after whitespace normalisation) by the proposing machine agent against the text extracted from the file retrieved on 2026-10-11. Checked by fresh-context machine audit on 2026-10-11 (review/frontier-governance-2-audit-2026-10-11.md). Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Provision as stated in the order dated 2023-07-10; effective 2023-08-15.
Record ID cn-genai-measures-security-assessment