Claim: Following the October 2025 recapitalization, the OpenAI Foundation…

Search by nameBrowse by topic

Core institutions

Document histories

Chinese AI histories

Three selected institutional histories, grouped here for navigation. The grouping implies no shared ownership, strategy or lineage.

DeepSeek Alibaba / Qwen Zhipu AI

Coverage is selective

Selected records
1965–2027
Dates after the latest check are scheduled dates

Latest source check
2026-10-26

All records

All topics

Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.

Through year Show

94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included

Claim and evidence

has an assessment of its control ↓Whether the OpenAI Foundation can exercise effective mission-directed control over OpenAI Group PBC in practice after the October 2025 recapitalization

Following the October 2025 recapitalization, the OpenAI Foundation can exercise effective mission-directed control over OpenAI Group PBC in practice.

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorQuestion posed by SelekoaUnresolved

Unresolved. The recorded evidence does not settle this question. The linked evidence is background only: it neither supports nor contradicts the claim.

Context: primary + secondary · 6 sources

Date: 2025-10-28 · event

Scope and limitsEffective control here concerns the Foundation’s ability to enforce its mission through its retained governance powers when commercial interests or Group management resist. OpenAI asserts continuing control; formal rights are documented separately. Bret Taylor’s announcement for OpenAI’s board says the recapitalization keeps the mission at the center and maintains the strongest representation of mission-focused governance in the industry. Not For Private Gain recognises improvements over the abandoned proposal while judging control weaker than under the former structure and identifying conditional risks to effective exercise. CalMatters reports critics’ concerns about possible commercial predominance. Fried and Reiter describe the Foundation’s appointment, veto and safety-blocking powers as substantial authority over investors and argue that guardians may do too much as well as too little. The Delaware Attorney General’s non-objection is conditional on representations. These sources do not settle practical effectiveness, and no legal conclusion or side is adopted.

The evidence 08

primary sourceContext only

Our structure

OpenAI · Publication date unknown

Archived copy, captured 2025-10-29: Our structure

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“The OpenAI Foundation continues to control the OpenAI Group.”

Location in source List under “With our updated structure, announced on October 28, 2025”, third item

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Undated web page describing the structure announced on October 28, 2025; inspected live 2026-10-04. The quoted sentences are identical in the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-29 (17:22 UTC); the board list differs between the two.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-10-29: Our structure. No publication date is recorded for this source. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-10-29. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: OpenAI, Our structure (web page).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-29. The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Moved from supporting to context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md): the passage does not directly assess the record’s practical-capability question. Human editorial review is pending.

secondary sourceContext only

Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring (Not For Private Gain update, November 2025)

Not For Private Gain · 2025-11

Archived copy, captured 2025-11-03: Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring (Not For Private Gain update, November 2025)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“While a significant downgrade from the nonprofit’s management-level control of OpenAI’s previous commercial entity, these are meaningful improvements from the original proposal.”

Location in source Section I, item 2 “Nonprofit control”, “Our assessment”, first sentence

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Page Hedley; Tyler Whitmer; Vivian Dong; Nathan Calvin
Version: Web page headed “Nov 2025”, inspected live 2026-10-04. The Internet Archive holds captures from 2025-11-03; the capture was not compared.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-11-03: Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring (Not For Private Gain update, November 2025). An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-11-03. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Page Hedley, Tyler Whitmer, Vivian Dong and Nathan Calvin, Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring, Not For Private Gain (November 2025).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The integrating session wrote or selected this passage from its own reading of the source; it does not repeat a passage from the week 4b research pass. Moved from contradicting to context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md): the passage does not directly assess the record’s practical-capability question. Human editorial review is pending.

secondary sourceContext only

Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring (Not For Private Gain update, November 2025)

Not For Private Gain · 2025-11

Archived copy, captured 2025-11-03: Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring (Not For Private Gain update, November 2025)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“If the directors on both boards end up being loyal primarily to the PBC, the nonprofit’s power to hire and fire PBC directors—the basis of its nominal control of the PBC—would be effectively meaningless.”

Location in source Section I, item 2 “Nonprofit control”, paragraph beginning “Although the nonprofit’s more-general power to hire and fire”

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Page Hedley; Tyler Whitmer; Vivian Dong; Nathan Calvin
Version: Web page headed “Nov 2025”, inspected live 2026-10-04. The Internet Archive holds captures from 2025-11-03; the capture was not compared.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-11-03: Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring (Not For Private Gain update, November 2025). An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-11-03. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Page Hedley, Tyler Whitmer, Vivian Dong and Nathan Calvin, Statement on OpenAI’s Restructuring, Not For Private Gain (November 2025).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Moved from contradicting to context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md): the passage does not directly assess the record’s practical-capability question. Human editorial review is pending.

secondary sourceContext only

OpenAI just cut a deal with California. Critics say it’s full of holes

CalMatters · 2025-10

Archived copy, captured 2025-10-30: OpenAI just cut a deal with California. Critics say it’s full of holes

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“The ChatGPT maker is putting its nonprofit arm nominally in control of the for-profit entity, but there are numerous ways the for-profit company could end up calling the shots, these people said.”

Location in source Second paragraph after the summary, second sentence

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Khari Johnson; Levi Sumagaysay
Version: Article page showing the dates October 30, 2025 and October 29, 2025 (metadata datePublished 2025-10-30), inspected live 2026-10-04; month precision is recorded. The Internet Archive holds captures from 2025-10-30; the capture was not compared.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-10-30: OpenAI just cut a deal with California. Critics say it’s full of holes. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-10-30. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Khari Johnson and Levi Sumagaysay, OpenAI just cut a deal with California. Critics say it’s full of holes, CalMatters (October 2025).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Moved from contradicting to context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md): the passage does not directly assess the record’s practical-capability question. Human editorial review is pending.

primary sourceContext only

Letter re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (statement of no objection)

Delaware Department of Justice (Office of the Attorney General) · 2025-10-28

Archived copy, captured 2025-10-31: Letter re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (statement of no objection)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“with the NFP retaining control of the PBC in accordance with the Representations herein”

Location in source Opening paragraph (page 1)

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Delaware Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General
Version: Letter dated October 28, 2025, to OpenAI, Inc.; PDF inspected 2026-10-04, byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-31. The earlier capture of 2025-10-28 differs only in also giving the recipient’s e-mail address.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-10-31: Letter re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (statement of no objection). Captured 3 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-10-31. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Delaware Department of Justice, letter to OpenAI, Inc. re: OpenAI, Inc.’s Corporate Restructuring (28 October 2025).
Reuse: Public government document; no redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending.

primary sourceContext only

Built to benefit everyone

OpenAI · 2025-10-28

Archived copy, captured 2025-10-28: Built to benefit everyone

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“The OpenAI Foundation controls the for-profit business, which was established in 2019, keeping our mission at the center.”

Location in source Section “Mission at the center”, second paragraph, first sentence

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Bret Taylor
Version: Web page dated October 28, 2025, by Bret Taylor as chair of the OpenAI board; inspected 2026-09-28 and again live 2026-10-04. Quotes used from 2026-10-04 also match the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-28 (13:26 UTC), read in a browser because its raw replay holds no article text.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-10-28: Built to benefit everyone. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-10-28. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Bret Taylor. Built to benefit everyone.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-28 (13:26 UTC), read in a browser because the capture's raw replay holds no article text. Added as context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md). Human editorial review is pending. Written by Bret Taylor as chair of OpenAI’s board.

primary sourceContext only

Built to benefit everyone

OpenAI · 2025-10-28

Archived copy, captured 2025-10-28: Built to benefit everyone

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“This recapitalization maintains the strongest representation of mission-focused governance in the industry today.”

Location in source Section “Mission at the center”, third paragraph

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Bret Taylor
Version: Web page dated October 28, 2025, by Bret Taylor as chair of the OpenAI board; inspected 2026-09-28 and again live 2026-10-04. Quotes used from 2026-10-04 also match the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-28 (13:26 UTC), read in a browser because its raw replay holds no article text.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-10-28: Built to benefit everyone. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-10-28. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Bret Taylor. Built to benefit everyone.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2025-10-28 (13:26 UTC), read in a browser because the capture's raw replay holds no article text. Added as context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md). Human editorial review is pending. Written by Bret Taylor as chair of OpenAI’s board.

secondary sourceContext only

AI Corporate Governance and Ben & Jerry’s Risk

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance · 2026-05-11

Archived copy, captured 2026-05-11: AI Corporate Governance and Ben & Jerry’s Risk

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“But it remains controlled by the nonprofit (now renamed OpenAI Foundation) which appoints every PBC director, holds veto rights over major transactions, and (through the Foundation’s Safety and Security Committee) can block any “PBC actions relating to safety and security.”

Location in source Paragraph beginning “OpenAI’s 2025 restructuring, we show”, third sentence

Machine-checked · 2026-10-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Jesse Fried; Idan Reiter
Version: Blog post dated Monday, May 11, 2026, summarising the authors’ paper of the same title; inspected live 2026-10-04. Quotes also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2026-05-11 (13:44 UTC).
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-05-11: AI Corporate Governance and Ben & Jerry’s Risk. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-05-11. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: Jesse Fried and Idan Reiter, AI Corporate Governance and Ben & Jerry’s Risk, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (11 May 2026).
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Verbatim quote, checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2026-05-11. Added as context on 2026-10-04 after the different-model check (review/week4c-gpt-check-2026-10-04.md). Human editorial review is pending. The authors’ analysis, not the Forum’s or Harvard’s position.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. One substantive proposition about how an entity is controlled in practice, for example whether a nonprofit can exercise effective control after a restructuring. The record is contested when opposing passages assess that same proposition, or an unresolved question carrying context evidence only; it is never supported. It is not evidence of the arrangement itself, which other records state.

Date. Dated by the recapitalization whose control arrangements the question concerns (the certificate filed and the Delaware Attorney General’s letter of 28 October 2025). The date does not bound a period of effective control, and no end is recorded. The cited passages were published from 28 October 2025 to 11 May 2026 (OpenAI’s structure page is undated); those are source dates, not the period of the question.

Record ID cs-assessed-openai-recapitalization-control

Explore the documentary record

All topics