Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Erdil and Besiroglu, “Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments” (2023-10-01) articulates G01. Opens the paper's summary of its assessment: substitution of AI for labour on most or all tasks makes explosive growth the default prediction of growth models. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2023-10-01 · publication Wording attested 2023-10-01. Version 2 (2023-10-01) is the earliest retrieved version; v1 has no capture. The v2 PDF itself was captured in 2025. Claimed date 2023-09-20. Date of v1, which was not retrieved. Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Tier Tier 1. Tier 1 (re-tiered on 2026-10-25). A scholarly review with an economist author: Tamay Besiroglu held an MPhil in Economics from the University of Cambridge before the text, as his own site says in a capture of 2021-09-15 and his MIT FutureTech profile states (degree of 2020); MIT FutureTech is his affiliation on the v2 title page. This reverses the tier-2 borderline settled on 2026-10-11, whose premise, that neither author was shown to be an economist, did not hold. Conditions AI able to substitute for human labour on most or all tasks. Scope and limits Absent from v3 (2024-07-15), which rewrites the introduction; this wording is attested from v2 only.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments ↗ arXiv:2309.11690 [econ.GN] · 2023-10-01
Archived copy, captured 2025-06-30: Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Growth theory models often predict explosive growth by default when AI is able to substitute for human labor on most or all tasks in the economy.” Location in source Section 1 (Introduction), list of four themes, first theme "Growth theory models predict explosive growth"
Machine-checked · 2026-10-14
Source details and check notes Authors Ege Erdil; Tamay Besiroglu Version Wayback capture of arxiv.org/pdf/2309.11690v2; compared with v3. Capture retrieved 2026-10-08 (SHA-256 28610b91d03d1d055d6e1af308b964387905af66557936ee49c622f693985617). Versions: arXiv v1 (2023-09-20): not retrieved; arXiv v2 (2023-10-01): checked; arXiv v3 (2024-07-15): compared. Published version: Erdil, E., & Besiroglu, T. (2023). Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments (arXiv:2309.11690v2) [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11690v2 No journal version located (Crossref search 2026-10-10 found none). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-08 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-06-30: Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments ↗ . Captured 638 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-06-30. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-08.Attribution Ege Erdil, Tamay Besiroglu, “Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments”, arXiv:2309.11690 [econ.GN], 2023-10-01. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage G01-d (research/economics-growth). The quotation (26 words) matched the checked expression (erdil-arxiv-v2) in the pack's verification; one other cached version lacks it. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-14 against a copy retrieved that day. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of v2, the checked version. arXiv submission history (2026 capture of the abstract page): v1 2023-09-20, v2 2023-10-01, v3 2024-07-15.
Record ID ec-g01-erdil-besiroglu-2023-explosive-growth-review-a