Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Erdil and Besiroglu, “Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments” (2023-10-01) contests G05. Accepts eventual limits and contests their timing, with an estimate of returns to scale. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2023-10-01 · publication Wording attested 2023-10-01. Version 2 (2023-10-01) is the earliest retrieved version; v1 has no capture. The v2 PDF itself was captured in 2025. Claimed date 2023-09-20. Date of v1, which was not retrieved. Role Contesting Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Engagement Engages a premise. Disputes the premise that resource constraints bind soon enough to preclude explosive growth. Tier Tier 1. Tier 1 (re-tiered on 2026-10-25). A scholarly review with an economist author: Tamay Besiroglu held an MPhil in Economics from the University of Cambridge before the text, as his own site says in a capture of 2021-09-15 and his MIT FutureTech profile states (degree of 2020); MIT FutureTech is his affiliation on the v2 title page. This reverses the tier-2 borderline settled on 2026-10-11, whose premise, that neither author was shown to be an economist, did not hold. Scope and limits The record documents what the text says; it does not establish that the argument or model is right.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments ↗ arXiv:2309.11690 [econ.GN] · 2023-10-01
Archived copy, captured 2025-06-30: Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Some version of this argument is certainly sound: there must eventually be some resource constraints that prevent output from growing arbitrarily large. The important question about this argument is not whether it holds eventually, but whether it holds quickly enough to preclude explosive growth.” Location in source Section 3.2 "Output is bottlenecked by other non-accumulable factors of production", paragraph containing "there might be intrinsic timescales"
Machine-checked · 2026-10-14
Source details and check notes Authors Ege Erdil; Tamay Besiroglu Version Wayback capture of arxiv.org/pdf/2309.11690v2; compared with v3. Capture retrieved 2026-10-08 (SHA-256 28610b91d03d1d055d6e1af308b964387905af66557936ee49c622f693985617). Versions: arXiv v1 (2023-09-20): not retrieved; arXiv v2 (2023-10-01): checked; arXiv v3 (2024-07-15): compared. Published version: Erdil, E., & Besiroglu, T. (2023). Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments (arXiv:2309.11690v2) [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11690v2 No journal version located (Crossref search 2026-10-10 found none). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-08 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-06-30: Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments ↗ . Captured 638 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-06-30. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-08.Attribution Ege Erdil, Tamay Besiroglu, “Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments”, arXiv:2309.11690 [econ.GN], 2023-10-01. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage G05-g (research/economics-growth). The quotation (44 words) matched the checked expression (erdil-arxiv-v2) in the pack's verification. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-14 against a copy retrieved that day. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document disputes the proposition or a premise it depends on. The record documents the text’s position, not who is right.
Date. Date of v2, the checked version. arXiv submission history (2026 capture of the abstract page): v1 2023-09-20, v2 2023-10-01, v3 2024-07-15.
Record ID ec-g05-erdil-besiroglu-2023-explosive-growth-review-c