primary source Supports the claim
The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different? ↗ Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(3), Summer 2015, pp. 31–50 · 2015
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “We consider the role of these three anxieties among economists, primarily focusing on the historical period from the late 18th to the early 20th century” Location in source AEA article page, Abstract (JEP 29(3), Summer 2015, pp. 31-50)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-14
Source details and check notes Authors Joel Mokyr; Chris Vickers; Nicolas L. Ziebarth Version Abstract page only. Current copy retrieved directly on 2026-10-09; no archive capture (Wayback unreachable), so earlier bytes are not authenticated. SHA-256 6ffad3804a44a4e3c85eb91edf84948b9b54c39407ab05e4269e72526f772f09. Full text not retrieved; only the AEA abstract page. Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., & Ziebarth, N. L. (2015). The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.31 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-09 Language English (en) Attribution Joel Mokyr, Chris Vickers, Nicolas L. Ziebarth, “The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(3), Summer 2015, pp. 31–50, 2015. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage M09-10 (research/economics-mainstream). The quotation (25 words) matched the retrieved current copy (SHA-256 6ffad3804a44a4e3c85eb91edf84948b9b54c39407ab05e4269e72526f772f09) in the pack's verification. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-14 against a copy retrieved that day, whose SHA-256 differs from the recorded one. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. AEA article page. Checked in a current copy; an archive capture was not available, so earlier bytes are not authenticated.
Record ID ec-m09-mokyr-vickers-ziebarth-2015-technological-anxiety-b