Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
METR’s o1-preview report explicitly reuses the general-autonomy test suite from its GPT-4o report. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2024-09-12 · publication Scope and limits Explicit reuse of the test task suite within METR’s reports; not reuse of every procedural detail or adoption by OpenAI.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Details about METR’s preliminary evaluation of OpenAI o1-preview ↗ METR · 2024-09-12
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase METR says its general-autonomy test suite is identical to the suite in its earlier GPT-4o report.
Location in source Details of Evaluation Procedure > Descriptions of task suites, numbered item 1, general-autonomy test suite.
Machine-checked · 2026-09-27
Source details and check notes Authors METR Version Dated preliminary report, current migrated web expression inspected 2026-09-27. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-27 Language English (en) Attribution METR, Details about METR’s preliminary evaluation of OpenAI o1-preview. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Attributed paraphrases and bibliographic metadata only; original documents linked, not redistributed. Check notes Original publisher passage machine-inspected. This is not human review or independent reproduction of the reported activity. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A document explicitly reports using an identified method or architecture from another work in its own study. Requires a named method and primary evidence from the reporting document. Citation, comparison, proposed future use and similarity alone do not qualify. This is reported use, not independently verified implementation or institutional adoption.
Date. Publication date, not the date of the underlying evaluation.
Record ID eval-i-o1-method