Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Country Reset filters
101 people, organisations and other records · 133 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
The initial draft's opening statement presents it as a foundation for further refinement in which Measures may be added, removed or modified, says that it is light in detail and that Sub-Measures and Key Performance Indicators are still being deliberated, and includes open questions for feedback. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Object version Initial draft (14 November 2024) · Published 2024-11-14 · Effective date not established Date 2024-11-14 · publication Scope and limits The authors' own characterisation of the draft, which they wrote as the Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the four working groups. A draft binds no one.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
First Draft General-Purpose AI Code of Practice ↗ European Commission · 2024-11-14
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Although the first draft is light in detail” Location in source Opening statement, fourth paragraph (p. 1)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-28
Source details and check notes Authors Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the Working Groups of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice Version Retrieved on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 e7522e16b0dd05f368592ff19cd2e4af1f1208be88015bfa0059cdb5f6a32354). The PDF served by the Commission's newsroom (document 109946), 36 pages, every page marked “DRAFT DOCUMENT”; its metadata gives creation on 14 November 2024, 10:55 UTC. Decision 5 of 2026-10-28: the Commission's own file is cited. The candidate pack first read the copy held by the Dutch Senate (Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, https://www.eerstekamer.nl/9370000/1/j4nvi0xeni9vr2l_j9vvkyblr2b3ny8/vmidr7qz6qv4/f=/vmidr9wfudtt.pdf, SHA-256 605816c07298146ec981fb46929518ee09d3072ea49994d2b1b032366555ba87); the cross-family check of 2026-10-28 found the two files' extracted text identical on all 36 pages, although the raw files differ. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the Working Groups of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, “First Draft General-Purpose AI Code of Practice”, 2024-11-14. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, frameworks to law (research/frameworks-to-law). The quotation (8 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-27 and again at admission on 2026-10-28, in a fresh retrieval of the Commission’s own file, which this record cites (SHA-256 e7522e16b0dd05f368592ff19cd2e4af1f1208be88015bfa0059cdb5f6a32354). Read directly from the Commission's newsroom. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
First Draft General-Purpose AI Code of Practice ↗ European Commission · 2024-11-14
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The authors present the draft as a foundation for refinement in which Measures may be added, removed or modified, say they continue to deliberate on specific Sub-Measures and KPIs, and add open questions to guide feedback.
Location in source Opening statement, third and fourth paragraphs (p. 1)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-28
Source details and check notes Authors Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the Working Groups of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice Version Retrieved on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 e7522e16b0dd05f368592ff19cd2e4af1f1208be88015bfa0059cdb5f6a32354). The PDF served by the Commission's newsroom (document 109946), 36 pages, every page marked “DRAFT DOCUMENT”; its metadata gives creation on 14 November 2024, 10:55 UTC. Decision 5 of 2026-10-28: the Commission's own file is cited. The candidate pack first read the copy held by the Dutch Senate (Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, https://www.eerstekamer.nl/9370000/1/j4nvi0xeni9vr2l_j9vvkyblr2b3ny8/vmidr7qz6qv4/f=/vmidr9wfudtt.pdf, SHA-256 605816c07298146ec981fb46929518ee09d3072ea49994d2b1b032366555ba87); the cross-family check of 2026-10-28 found the two files' extracted text identical on all 36 pages, although the raw files differ. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the Working Groups of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, “First Draft General-Purpose AI Code of Practice”, 2024-11-14. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, frameworks to law (research/frameworks-to-law). The paraphrase is Selekoa’s, written from the copy held by the Dutch Senate, whose extracted text is identical to the Commission’s file; it is not a quotation and was not machine-matched. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. Publication of a specific document or version. Publication of a policy is not evidence of implementation.
Date. Dated by the Commission’s publication of the initial draft on 14 November 2024.
Record ID fl-eu-cop-draft1-light-detail