Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1994 1993 1992 1991 1989 1986 1985 1984 1983 1979 1966 1965 1961 1960 1955 1952 1950 1872 1863 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Country Reset filters
101 people, organisations and other records · 133 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
The U.S. AI Safety Institute issued the initial public draft of NIST AI 800-1, "Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models", dated July 2024. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 2 sources
Object version Initial public draft (July 2024) · Published 2024-07 · Effective date not established Date 2024-07 · publication Scope and limits A draft of voluntary guidance; no final version was located.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
NIST AI 800-1 Initial Public Draft: Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (July 2024) ↗ National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S. AI Safety Institute) · 2024-07
Archived copy, captured 2024-07-27: NIST AI 800-1 Initial Public Draft: Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (July 2024) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Initial Public Draft” Location in source Title page (PDF p. 2)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-28
Source details and check notes Authors U.S. AI Safety Institute (NIST) Version Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 30ced091493af421d454ca138a3496a39b8c6079f74223e868325318ffa767e4). The cross-family check of 2026-10-28 opened the Internet Archive capture linked here and matched the quoted wording in it, the release-period expression (decision 9); a capture shows only what the archive retrieved that day. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-27 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2024-07-27: NIST AI 800-1 Initial Public Draft: Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (July 2024) ↗ . An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-07-27. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-27.Attribution U.S. AI Safety Institute (NIST), “NIST AI 800-1 Initial Public Draft: Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (July 2024)”, 2024-07. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, frameworks to law (research/frameworks-to-law). The quotation (3 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-27 and again at admission on 2026-10-28, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Read directly from nvlpubs.nist.gov. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-28, item 30) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Updated Guidelines for Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (January 15, 2025) ↗ National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2025-01-15
Archived copy, captured 2025-01-15: Updated Guidelines for Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (January 15, 2025) ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “the initial public draft (released July 2024)” Location in source News page, second paragraph
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-28
Source details and check notes Authors National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S. AI Safety Institute) Version Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 1c2ea82f25c259fad9acb419a71790844c0e5df49971592cf40534d4afd0ea40). The cross-family check of 2026-10-28 opened the Internet Archive capture linked here and matched the quoted wording in it, the release-period expression (decision 9); a capture shows only what the archive retrieved that day. Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-27 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-01-15: Updated Guidelines for Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (January 15, 2025) ↗ . Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-01-15. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-27.Attribution National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S. AI Safety Institute), “Updated Guidelines for Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models (January 15, 2025)”, 2025-01-15. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, frameworks to law (research/frameworks-to-law). The quotation (7 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-27 and again at admission on 2026-10-28, in a fresh retrieval of the same address (the page’s bytes had changed). Read directly from www.nist.gov. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-28, item 30) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. Publication of a specific document or version. Publication of a policy is not evidence of implementation.
Date. Month from the title page.
Record ID fl-us-nist-ai-800-1-ipd-published