Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
FSF v2.0 introduces recommended security levels for Critical Capability Levels. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Basis of the change Stated by the publisher Subject version v2.0 · Published 2025-02-04 · Effective date not established Object version v1.0 · Published 2024-05-17 · Effective date not established Date 2025-02-04 · publication Scope and limits The source calls these recommendations and discusses collective adoption. This claim does not assert that every level was implemented.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Updating the Frontier Safety Framework ↗ Google DeepMind · 2025-02-04
Archived copy, captured 2025-11-05: Updating the Frontier Safety Framework ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Since then, we have drawn on wider research to evolve these security mitigation levels and recommend a level for each of our CCLs.*” Location in source Section "Recommendations for Heightened Security", second paragraph, first sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Google DeepMind Version Dated official update announcement Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2025-11-05: Updating the Frontier Safety Framework ↗ . Captured 274 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-11-05. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Google DeepMind, Updating the Frontier Safety Framework. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim excerpt checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the live page and the Internet Archive capture of 2025-11-05; it replaces an earlier attributed paraphrase. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. One scoped difference between document versions. The claim identifies publisher-stated change, official changelog/redline, or an explicitly inferred comparison. It does not establish implementation, effectiveness or a safety ranking.
Date. The sourced publication date does not establish an implementation or effective date.
Record ID fsf-v2-security-levels