Claim and evidence Close ×
Sutton's slides for a talk of 3 December 2013 define the AI singularity as the point "When the smartest thing on the planet is designed rather than evolved", state that, unless humans destroy themselves first, economic incentives push "inexorably towards an AI singularity", and state that humans probably cannot prevent or control the AIs. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2013-12-03 · event Records dated 2013 → Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits Slides, read without the spoken talk; the definition slide also quotes Vernor Vinge. The slides pose "Is it a good thing?" without a recorded answer.
The evidence 03 primary source Supports the claim
The AI Singularity: Prospects for Digital Immortality (slides) ↗ Author's site (incompleteideas.net, Talks page) · 2013-12-03
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “When the smartest thing on the planet is designed rather than evolved” Location in source Slide 2, "The Technological (AI) Singularity"
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors Rich Sutton Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 5e9c8053d76e9b3cea1a7db738ef050e35572dcfe09f163077ce7c6d7bd965be). slides PDF linked from the author's Talks page; retrieved over plain HTTP because the site's HTTPS certificate failed verification. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution Rich Sutton, “The AI Singularity: Prospects for Digital Immortality (slides)”, 2013-12-03. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (12 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-01, item 36) classified the record’s passage blind and reached the same stance. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
The AI Singularity: Prospects for Digital Immortality (slides) ↗ Author's site (incompleteideas.net, Talks page) · 2013-12-03
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The slide states that we can help make the AIs, profit from them and become them, but probably cannot prevent or control them.
Location in source Slide "Implications for us?"
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors Rich Sutton Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 5e9c8053d76e9b3cea1a7db738ef050e35572dcfe09f163077ce7c6d7bd965be). slides PDF linked from the author's Talks page; retrieved over plain HTTP because the site's HTTPS certificate failed verification. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution Rich Sutton, “The AI Singularity: Prospects for Digital Immortality (slides)”, 2013-12-03. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The paraphrase is Selekoa’s, written from the text retrieved for the candidate pack; it is not a quotation and was not machine-matched. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-01, item 36) classified the record’s passage blind and reached the same stance. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
The AI Singularity: Prospects for Digital Immortality (slides) ↗ Author's site (incompleteideas.net, Talks page) · 2013-12-03
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “there will be strong, multi-incremental economic incentives pushing inexorably towards an AI singularity” Location in source Slide "Will the AI singularity occur? Second, if it can be done, will it be done?" (PDF p. 5)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors Rich Sutton Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 5e9c8053d76e9b3cea1a7db738ef050e35572dcfe09f163077ce7c6d7bd965be). slides PDF linked from the author's Talks page; retrieved over plain HTTP because the site's HTTPS certificate failed verification. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution Rich Sutton, “The AI Singularity: Prospects for Digital Immortality (slides)”, 2013-12-03. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (13 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. Conditional on the preceding bullets: "Not if we destroy ourselves first of course" / "If that doesn’t happen, then …"; the next bullet reads "It seems unlikely that they could be resisted". A cross-family machine check (2026-11-01, item 36) classified the record’s passage blind and reached the same stance. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date the talk was given.
Record ID ht-w01-sutton-2013-ai-singularity-slides