Claim and evidence Close ×
The e/acc newsletter's post of 26 December 2022 answers the question whether e/acc wants to get rid of humans with "No" and states that human flourishing is one of its core values. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2022-12-26 · publication Records dated 2022 → Role Contesting Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Engagement States the contrary. It states that human flourishing is a core value and that a monoculture is undesirable, without engaging the argument that succession would be acceptable. Scope and limits The post holds a mixed future of biological and "technological life" desirable; it does not discuss succession arguments as such. The same section states, in a passage on environments that support only simple biological life such as extremophiles, that biology will always have a place, if nothing else as a resilient backup system.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
what the f* is e/acc ↗ e/acc newsletter (effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com) · 2022-12-26
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Do you want to get rid of humans? No. Human flourishing is one of our core values!” Location in source Section "Do you want to get rid of humans?"
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors e/acc Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 b58a190dc028de0aa2a4119325a7defa80a049530e8ad5a7bc622d85d52f0b26). Substack post dated Dec 26, 2022, subtitled "a classic e/acc post", as served on 2026-10-31. The page byline reads "e/acc and", with a second byline that has no display name (the page data list it with a Substack handle only). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution e/acc, “what the f* is e/acc”, 2022-12-26. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (17 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
what the f* is e/acc ↗ e/acc newsletter (effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com) · 2022-12-26
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “We are humans, and we love humans.” Location in source Same section
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors e/acc Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 b58a190dc028de0aa2a4119325a7defa80a049530e8ad5a7bc622d85d52f0b26). Substack post dated Dec 26, 2022, subtitled "a classic e/acc post", as served on 2026-10-31. The page byline reads "e/acc and", with a second byline that has no display name (the page data list it with a Substack handle only). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution e/acc, “what the f* is e/acc”, 2022-12-26. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (7 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document disputes the proposition or a premise it depends on. The record documents the text’s position, not who is right.
Date. Date of posting.
Record ID ht-w02-eacc-2022-what-the-f-is-eacc