Claim and evidence Close ×
Beff Jezos and bayes's post of 10 July 2022 states that e/acc has "no particular allegiance to the biological substrate for intelligence and life" and that, if one seeks to increase the amount of intelligence in the universe, staying perpetually anchored to the human form is counter-productive. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2022-07-10 · publication Records dated 2022 → Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits The post states acceptance of non-biological successors to the human form; it does not state that humans should cease to exist.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Notes on e/acc principles and tenets ↗ Beff's Newsletter (beff.substack.com) · 2022-07-10
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “e/acc has no particular allegiance to the biological substrate for intelligence and life” Location in source Point-form notes, paragraph on transhumanism
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors Beff Jezos; bayes Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 8a66d074cbddc194096c9d5541f3e8f5204de87459dcd0409efc7fa1080258a2). Substack post dated Jul 10, 2022, as served on 2026-10-31; the same text was reposted on effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com on 2022-10-31. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution Beff Jezos, bayes, “Notes on e/acc principles and tenets”, 2022-07-10. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (13 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Notes on e/acc principles and tenets ↗ Beff's Newsletter (beff.substack.com) · 2022-07-10
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The post states that staying perpetually anchored to the human form is counter-productive if one seeks to increase intelligence in the universe, and that if every species had feared evolutionary forks from itself, higher intelligence would not have emerged.
Location in source Point-form notes, "counter-points against proponents of deceleration"
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors Beff Jezos; bayes Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 8a66d074cbddc194096c9d5541f3e8f5204de87459dcd0409efc7fa1080258a2). Substack post dated Jul 10, 2022, as served on 2026-10-31; the same text was reposted on effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com on 2022-10-31. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-31 Language English (en) Attribution Beff Jezos, bayes, “Notes on e/acc principles and tenets”, 2022-07-10. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The paraphrase is Selekoa’s, written from the text retrieved for the candidate pack; it is not a quotation and was not machine-matched. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of posting.
Record ID ht-w02-jezos-bayes-2022-notes-eacc-principles