Claim and evidence Close ×
Chalmers's paper of 2010 holds that functionalist theories, on which uploads can be conscious, are closer to the truth. It states that he is unsure whether a further-fact or a deflationary view of personal identity is correct; on the former, gradual uploading plausibly suffices for survival, and on the latter it is close to as good as ordinary survival. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2010 · publication Records dated 2010 → Wording attested 2026-10-31. Wording read in the author-hosted PDF retrieved on 2026-10-31; its revision date is unknown (as the dataset records), and its first page states the 2010 publication in the Journal of Consciousness Studies. The cross-family check found two passages of the paper in an archive capture of 21 August 2010 (the capture requested for 13 June 2010 redirects to it); not every passage of this record was compared with it. Not compared with the journal pages. Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits Chalmers states that the status of destructive and reconstructive uploading is unclear on some views of personal identity; the record covers his conclusion on gradual uploading.
The evidence 03 primary source Supports the claim
The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗ Journal of Consciousness Studies · 2010
Archived copy, captured 2026-09-17: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “My own view is that functionalist theories are closer to the truth here.” Location in source Section 9 "Uploading and Consciousness", PDF p. 36
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors David J. Chalmers Version Author-hosted 56-page expression; first-page footnote identifies 2010 journal publication, volume 17, pp. 7–65. Revision date unknown; PDF pagination differs from journal pagination. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-20 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-09-17: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗ . An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-09-17. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-20.Attribution David J. Chalmers, The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis (2010). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases only; no full source, personal contact details or dataset imported. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (13 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-01, item 22) classified the record’s passage blind and reached the same stance. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗ Journal of Consciousness Studies · 2010
Archived copy, captured 2026-09-17: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “If the further-fact view is correct, then the status of destructive and reconstructive uploading is unclear, but I think that gradual uploading plausibly suffices for survival. If the deflationary view is correct, gradual uploading is close to as good as ordinary survival” Location in source Section 10 "Uploading and Personal Identity", "Upshot", PDF p. 53
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors David J. Chalmers Version Author-hosted 56-page expression; first-page footnote identifies 2010 journal publication, volume 17, pp. 7–65. Revision date unknown; PDF pagination differs from journal pagination. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-20 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-09-17: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗ . An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-09-17. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-20.Attribution David J. Chalmers, The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis (2010). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases only; no full source, personal contact details or dataset imported. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (42 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-01, item 22) classified the record’s passage blind and reached the same stance. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗ Journal of Consciousness Studies · 2010
Archived copy, captured 2026-09-17: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “I am not sure whether a further-fact view or a deflationary view is correct.” Location in source Same paragraph
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-01
Source details and check notes Authors David J. Chalmers Version Author-hosted 56-page expression; first-page footnote identifies 2010 journal publication, volume 17, pp. 7–65. Revision date unknown; PDF pagination differs from journal pagination. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-20 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-09-17: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis ↗ . An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-09-17. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-20.Attribution David J. Chalmers, The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis (2010). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases only; no full source, personal contact details or dataset imported. Check notes Candidate pack passage, machine succession, scale and acceleration (research/heterodox-thought). The quotation (14 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-01, item 22) classified the record’s passage blind and reached the same stance. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of publication, as the source gives it.
Record ID ht-w03-chalmers-singularity