Claim · 2018-11-19 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction cites Concrete Problems in AI Safety.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction → cites → Concrete Problems in AI Safety

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncites ↓Concrete Problems in AI Safety

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2018-11-19 · publication Records dated 2018 →

Scope and limitsAn explicit reference only; neither agreement nor influence. The citing text does not identify which version of the work was read.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction

arXiv · 2018-11-19

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

The text gives the arXiv identifier 1606.06565.

Location in source PDF p. 22, reference by arXiv identifier

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: Jan Leike; David Krueger; Tom Everitt; Miljan Martic; Vishal Maini; Shane Legg
Version: arXiv:1811.07871v1; first-submission date from version history. Later revisions are not substituted.
Version date: 2018-11-19
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-09-25
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Jan Leike; David Krueger; Tom Everitt; Miljan Martic; Vishal Maini; Shane Legg, Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases only; source publications and personal contact details are not redistributed.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, key papers (research/key-papers). The citation was matched (arXiv identifier) in the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and re-found by its mechanical check. The paraphrase is Selekoa’s. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An explicit reference to a work. Citation alone is neither agreement nor causal influence.

Date. Date of the citing source as recorded in the dataset; unknown where the dataset has none.

Record ID kp-cites-reward-modeling-paper-concrete-problems-paper