Claim · 2022-10-17 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The paper defines BIG-Bench Hard (BBH), a suite of 23 BIG-Bench tasks, and studies chain-of-thought prompting on it.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them → states its contribution → The paper defines BIG-Bench Hard (BBH), a suite of 23 BIG-Bench tasks, and studies chain-of-thought prompting on it.

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themstates its contribution ↓The paper defines BIG-Bench Hard (BBH), a suite of 23 BIG-Bench tasks, and studies chain-of-thought prompting on it.

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2022-10-17 · publication Records dated 2022 →

Scope and limitsThe paper's own description of its contribution; not an assessment of it.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them

arXiv · 2022-10-17

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“In this work, we focus on a suite of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks which we call BIG-Bench Hard (BBH).”

Location in source arXiv v1, PDF p. 1, abstract

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: Mirac Suzgun; Nathan Scales; Nathanael Schärli; Sebastian Gehrmann; Yi Tay; Hyung Won Chung; Aakanksha Chowdhery; Quoc V. Le; Ed H. Chi; Denny Zhou; Jason Wei
Version: arXiv:2210.09261v1, submitted 17 October 2022 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 168f6fff020e9fde7563905f69e6a59d0648f195f48820d52c83c7adfaee18ec). The author list is the byline as printed on the first page.
Version date: 2022-10-17
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-28
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Mirac Suzgun and others, “Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them”, 2022-10-17.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, key papers (research/key-papers). The quotation (19 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (research/key-papers/verification.json). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and line-break hyphens, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item B042) found the quotation at its locator. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A paper or other publication describes its own contribution, quoted from the expression the record names, usually its abstract or introduction. The record is the document’s own description, not an assessment: a claim of priority or novelty it contains is the document’s claim, flagged as such, and says nothing about earlier or later work.

Date. Date of the arXiv version quoted, submitted 17 October 2022 (UTC); later versions may word it differently.

Record ID kp-states-challenging-big-bench-tasks-whether-2022-1