Claim · 2017-04-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The paper presents RACE, a dataset for benchmark evaluation of reading comprehension methods.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations → states its contribution → The paper presents RACE, a dataset for benchmark evaluation of reading comprehension methods.

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationsstates its contribution ↓The paper presents RACE, a dataset for benchmark evaluation of reading comprehension methods.

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2017-04-15 · publication Records dated 2017 →

Scope and limitsThe paper's own description of its contribution; not an assessment of it.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations

arXiv · 2017-04-15

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“We present RACE, a new dataset for benchmark evaluation of methods in the reading comprehension task.”

Location in source arXiv v1, PDF p. 1, abstract

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: Guokun Lai; Qizhe Xie; Hanxiao Liu; Yiming Yang; Eduard Hovy
Version: arXiv:1704.04683v1, submitted 15 April 2017 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 38806a3438899820fe2d9efd5a7c864cdb0b985c910762520595c3d9661b143c). The author list is the byline as printed on the first page.
Version date: 2017-04-15
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-28
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Guokun Lai, Qizhe Xie, Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang, Eduard Hovy, “RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations”, 2017-04-15.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, key papers (research/key-papers). The quotation (16 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (research/key-papers/verification.json). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and line-break hyphens, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A paper or other publication describes its own contribution, quoted from the expression the record names, usually its abstract or introduction. The record is the document’s own description, not an assessment: a claim of priority or novelty it contains is the document’s claim, flagged as such, and says nothing about earlier or later work.

Date. Date of the arXiv version quoted, submitted 15 April 2017 (UTC); later versions may word it differently.

Record ID kp-states-race-large-scale-reading-comprehension-2017-1