Claim · 2023-07-10 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

China generative AI interim measures (2023) states what the law question “Enforcer” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法), Order No. 15 → states provision → Enforcer

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法), Order No. 15states provision ↓Enforcer

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Who decides · provision ID comparison-law-q14
Subject version: Order No. 15, dated 10 July 2023 · Published 2023-07-10 · Effective 2023-08-15
Date: 2023-07-10 · publication Records dated 2023 →

Scope and limitsThese departments strengthen the management of generative AI services 'according to their respective duties' (Article 16). Supervision and inspection (Article 19) and penalties (Article 21) are assigned to 'competent authorities' (有关主管部门) without further naming; Article 20 names the national cyberspace department (国家网信部门) for services provided from outside China. What the instrument’s text states, from the expression read. A cell records what the text requires of the parties it defines: not whether any developer falls within them, or complied.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services), gov.cn State Council policy library copy

中国政府网 (www.gov.cn), 国务院政策文件库 · 2023-07-10 · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)

Archived copy, captured 2026-10-13: 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services), gov.cn State Council policy library copy

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“网信、发展改革、教育、科技、工业和信息化、公安、广播电视、新闻出版等部门”

Location in source Article 16 (第十六条), first paragraph

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: 国家互联网信息办公室 (Cyberspace Administration of China) and six other departments
Version: Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 00bd290a9d14e7354b7131d30255daae26ce7ff73588483cbeb2030f56878277). A second posting of the text of the dataset's source for the Measures (the CAC's posting of 13 July 2023): the gov.cn State Council policy library page, which gives its source as 国家网信办网站 and its document date (成文日期) as 2023-07-10. The page body repeats the text twice (a print copy). The two postings were not compared word for word; every passage cited from this source was matched in this copy. The quotation limit is applied to this source and the CAC posting together. The English in parentheses in the title is a machine translation. The Internet Archive capture of 13 October 2026, linked here, was read on 2026-11-04 by a model of another family (research/archive-batch-2026-11-04/codex-report.md, D16 reads). It matched the source’s stored hash, its displayed dates and every quotation from it.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-27
Language: Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-10-13: 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services), gov.cn State Council policy library copy. Captured 1191 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-10-13. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-27.
Attribution: 国家互联网信息办公室 (Cyberspace Administration of China) and six other departments, “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services), gov.cn State Council policy library copy”, 2023-07-10.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, laws compared (research/laws-compared), cell cn-genai-measures:Q14. The quotation (36 characters) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-01 (SHA-256 00bd290a9d14e7354b7131d30255daae26ce7ff73588483cbeb2030f56878277) and again in fresh retrievals on 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The translation is Selekoa’s working translation, not verified by a person. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-02, item 107) checked this cell directly and found it supported. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “Order No. 15, dated 10 July 2023”.

Record ID lc-cell-cn-genai-measures-q14