Claim · 2024-07-12 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

EU AI Act (2024) states what the law question “Risk evaluation” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), as published in the Official Journal → states provision → Risk evaluation

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), as published in the Official Journalstates provision ↓Risk evaluation

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Required action · provision ID comparison-law-q05
Subject version: As published in the Official Journal (12 July 2024) · Published 2024-07-12 · Effective date not established
Date: 2024-07-12 · publication Records dated 2024 →

Scope and limitsApplies to providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk. The provision does not tie the evaluation to a point before or after the model is placed on the market. What the instrument’s text states, from the expression read. A cell records what the text requires of the parties it defines: not whether any developer falls within them, or complied.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)

Official Journal of the European Union (EUR-Lex) · 2024-07-12

Archived copy, captured 2024-07-12: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“perform model evaluation in accordance with standardised protocols and tools reflecting the state of the art, including conducting and documenting adversarial testing”

Location in source Article 55(1), point (a)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: European Parliament and Council of the European Union
Version: Official Journal L series edition of 12.7.2024, English HTML, retrieved 2026-10-10. The text of the Internet Archive capture of 2024-07-12 matched it apart from the numbering of footnote markers in the amending articles. Later amendments (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744) are not applied to this text. Retrieved again for the laws-compared candidate pack on 2026-11-01 from the Publications Office’s repository (Cellar), because EUR-Lex returned an empty response (SHA-256 8f0b656302f9864cc87e040c371f209a9d65ae1a6cecc25ca5eb737e872d721a); the pack’s quotations were matched in it, and again in fresh retrievals of 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-10
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2024-07-12: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-07-12. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-10.
Attribution: European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), Official Journal L, 12.7.2024.
Reuse: Official legal text; no redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, laws compared (research/laws-compared), cell eu-ai-act:Q05. The quotation (22 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-01 (SHA-256 8f0b656302f9864cc87e040c371f209a9d65ae1a6cecc25ca5eb737e872d721a) and again in fresh retrievals on 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The same words are quoted in an earlier record of the dataset, so they add nothing to the source’s quotation count. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-02, item 87) checked this cell directly and found it supported. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “As published in the Official Journal (12 July 2024)”.

Record ID lc-cell-eu-ai-act-q05