Claim · 2026-07-06 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Illinois AI Safety Measures Act states what the law question “Outside assessment” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act (Public Act 104-0538) → states provision → Outside assessment

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act (Public Act 104-0538)states provision ↓Outside assessment

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Required action · provision ID comparison-law-q06
Subject version: Public Act 104-0538, as enacted (approved 6 July 2026) · Published 2026-07-06 · Effective 2027-01-01
Date: 2026-07-06 · publication Records dated 2026 →

Scope and limitsAn annual independent audit of the large frontier developer's compliance with Section 10 (framework, transparency report, internal-use summaries, statements, redactions): an assessment of the developer's practices, not a test of the model. It begins on 1 January 2028 or 90 days after the developer first qualifies as a large frontier developer, whichever is later. The auditor must have no financial interest in the developer (or the developer in it), must have access to unredacted materials, reports on substantial compliance and internal controls (Section 10(d)(1)–(2)); a redacted copy and a summary are published and sent to the Agency and the Attorney General within 30 days (Section 10(d)(4)). The Agency and the Attorney General also review incident reports (Section 15(d)), a review of filings. What the instrument’s text states, from the expression read. A cell records what the text requires of the parties it defines: not whether any developer falls within them, or complied.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Illinois Public Act 104-0538 (SB 315), Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act, enacted text (PDF)

Illinois General Assembly · Publication date unknown

Archived copy, captured 2026-09-08: Illinois Public Act 104-0538 (SB 315), Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act, enacted text (PDF)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“a large frontier developer shall annually retain a third party to perform an independent audit of compliance with the requirements of this Section.”

Location in source Section 10(d), first sentence, PDF p. 8

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Illinois General Assembly
Version: Enacted text as printed in the official PDF (SHA-256 f10cd7d854d5a6e1ab2c5e982e458d744abbfbdafde97f897ae03d1d8069f71f, 56 pages), read in a saved copy: the cross-family checker's session saved the PDF from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-08 (HTTP 200) on 2026-11-04 and extracted its text layer (pdfjs-dist), which the laws-compared research pack keeps. The preparer read that saved text, not the PDF: ilga.gov refused its requests (HTTP 403 after a certificate failure) and web.archive.org reset its connections. The text layer prints superscripts on the line (“10 26” for 10^26). The act's own text carries no date.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-09-08: Illinois Public Act 104-0538 (SB 315), Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act, enacted text (PDF). No publication date is recorded for this source. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-09-08. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-04.
Attribution: Illinois General Assembly, Public Act 104-0538 (SB 315), Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act.
Reuse: Official government text; no redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each, and at most 5% of a document over about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, laws compared (research/laws-compared), cell il-aisma:Q06. The quotation (23 words) matched the saved text of the enacted act (from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-08 of the official PDF, SHA-256 f10cd7d854d5a6e1ab2c5e982e458d744abbfbdafde97f897ae03d1d8069f71f) on 2026-11-04. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The cross-family checker read the act independently on 2026-11-04 (item 6) and gave this cell the status stated, as here. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “Public Act 104-0538, as enacted (approved 6 July 2026)”.

Record ID lc-cell-il-aisma-q06