Claim · 2023-11-01 · publication · Inferred · Supported

No passage meeting the law question “Incident reporting” was found in EO 14110 (2023) within the inspected scope.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Executive Order 14110: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence → has no matching provision within the inspected scope → Incident reporting

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

Executive Order 14110: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligencehas no matching provision within the inspected scope ↓Incident reporting

Machine-checkedInferredSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Reasoning and premisesPremises: the law question asks for the following. A duty to report incidents, defined however the instrument defines them, to a named public authority. The deadline is quoted where stated. Partly if a reporting duty has no stated deadline, or runs to someone other than a public authority. The inspected scope of EO 14110 (2023) was: Whole cached text of the Federal Register printing (88 FR 75191–75226), with close reading of Secs. 3, 4.1, 4.2, 12 and 13 and the signature block. Terms searched: “incident”, “report”. Passages read and not counted: Sec. 4.3(a)(v), 88 FR 75200: Critical-infrastructure agencies' advice on “incident response related to AI usage”; agency task, not a company reporting duty. Sec. 5.2(d)(i), 88 FR 75207: Agency programme on reports of AI-related IP theft; not a company duty. Sec. 8(b)(iv)(A), 88 FR 75215: Common framework for identifying and capturing clinical errors and incidents in health care; agency task. Sec. 4.2(a)(ii), 88 FR 75197: Reporting of computing-cluster acquisition, development or possession; not incidents. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.

Provision: Reporting · provision ID comparison-law-q07
Subject version: As published in the Federal Register (1 November 2023) · Published 2023-11-01 · Effective date not established
Date: 2023-11-01 · publication Records dated 2023 →

Scope and limitsNo duty on companies to report incidents to an authority was found. A recorded absence within the stated scope of the text read: not evidence that the instrument lacks such a provision elsewhere, or that no other law imposes one.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Executive Order 14110 of October 30, 2023: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (88 FR 75191)

The White House · 2023-11-01

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the law question “Incident reporting” was found.

Location in source EO 14110 (2023): Whole cached text of the Federal Register printing (88 FR 75191–75226), with close reading of Secs. 3, 4.1, 4.2, 12 and 13 and the signature block.

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: The White House
Version: Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 46739dfc1af256961458d3b73fa4d6f4b447b38eaa72efd80966463818be68ab). Federal Register print of 1 November 2023, Vol. 88, No. 210, pp. 75191–75226, FR Doc. 2023-24283. The PDF text layer renders superscript exponents inline (10^26 appears as "1026"); quotes stop before such numbers. Publisher as printed on the inspected expression: Federal Register (Office of the Federal Register, National Archives) via govinfo.gov.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-27
Language: English (en)
Attribution: The White House, “Executive Order 14110 of October 30, 2023: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (88 FR 75191)”, 2023-11-01.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Absence recorded for the laws-compared candidate pack (research/laws-compared) on 2026-11-01 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-02, item 68) answered this cell blind and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “As published in the Federal Register (1 November 2023)”.

Record ID lc-cell-us-eo14110-q07