Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Learning to summarize from human feedback cites Human Preferences. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2020-09-02 · publication Scope and limits An explicit work-level reference only; neither agreement nor a causal influence claim. The citing text does not identify a particular arXiv revision of the target.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Learning to summarize from human feedback ↗ arXiv · 2020-09-02
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase Reference [10] identifies Christiano and colleagues’ 2017 paper.
Location in source v1 References [10], PDF p. 11
Machine-checked · 2026-09-20
Source details and check notes Authors Nisan Stiennon; Long Ouyang; Jeff Wu; Daniel M. Ziegler; Ryan Lowe; Chelsea Voss; Alec Radford; Dario Amodei; Paul Christiano Version arXiv:2009.01325v1; first-submission date from version history. Later revisions are not substituted. Version date 2020-09-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-20 Language English (en) Attribution Nisan Stiennon; Long Ouyang; Jeff Wu; Daniel M. Ziegler; Ryan Lowe; Chelsea Voss; Alec Radford; Dario Amodei; Paul Christiano, Learning to summarize from human feedback (2020-09-02). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases only; no full source, personal contact details or dataset imported. Check notes Relevant source passage inspected by machine. Primary for what this document states; no independent replication or human review. Existing source access dates are retained; this evidence check has its own date. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An explicit reference to a work. Citation alone is neither agreement nor causal influence.
Date. First arXiv submission date of the inspected v1 expression; not the method invention date or a claim about later revisions.
Record ID lineage-summaries-cites-preferences